A representative reference for MRI-based human axon radius assessment using light microscopy
Laurin MordhorstiD, Maria Morozova, Sebastian PapazoglouiD, Björn FrickeiD, Jan Malte OeschgeriD, Thibault TabariniD, Henriette RuschiD, Carsten JägeriD, Stefan GeyeriD, Nikolaus WeiskopfiD, Markus MorawskiiD, Siawoosh MohammadiiD
Abstract
Non-invasive assessment of axon radii via MRI bears great potential for clinical and neuroscience research as it is a main determinant of the neuronal conduction velocity. However, there is a lack of representative histological reference data on the scale of the cross-section of MRI voxels for validating the MRI-visible, effective radius (reff). Because the current gold standard stems from neuroanatomical studies designed to estimate the frequency-weighted arithmetic mean radius (rarith) on small ensembles of axons, it is unsuited to estimate the tail-weighted reff. We propose CNN-based segmentation on high-resolution, large-scale light microscopy (lsLM) data to generate a representative reference for reff. In a human corpus callosum, we assessed estimation accuracy and bias of rarith and reff. Furthermore, we investigated whether mapping anatomy-related variation of rarith and reff is confounded by low-frequency variation of the image intensity, e.g., due to staining heterogeneity. Finally, we analyzed the potential error due to outstandingly large axons in reff. Compared to rarith, reff was estimated with higher accuracy (normalized-root-mean-square-error of reff: 7.2 %; rarith: 21.5 %) and lower bias (normalized-mean-bias-error of reff: -1.7 %; rarith: 16 %). While rarith was confounded by variation of the image intensity, variation of reff seemed anatomy-related. The largest axons contributed between 0.9 % and 3 % to reff. In conclusion, the proposed method accurately estimates reff at MRI voxel resolution across a human corpus callosum sample. Further investigations are required to assess generalization to brain areas with different axon radii ensembles.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Field percentile
- top 38%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mapping axon conduction delays in vivo from microstructural MRI
Mark Drakesmith, Robbert Harms, … Derek Kenton Jones·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 19, 2019
- Axon morphology is modulated by the local environment and impacts the non-invasive investigation of its structure-function relationship
Mariam Andersson, Hans Martin Kjer, … Tim B. Dyrby·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2020
- Electron microscopy 3-dimensional segmentation and quantification of axonal dispersion and diameter distribution in mouse brain corpus callosum
Hong‐Hsi Lee, Katarina Yaros, … Els Fieremans·Brain Structure and FunctionPeer-reviewed·Feb 21, 2019
- The influence of axonal beading and undulation on axonal diameter mapping
Hong‐Hsi Lee, Qiyuan Tian, … Susie Y. Huang·bioRxiv·Apr 19, 2023
- Mapping axon diameters and conduction velocity in the rat brain - different methods tell different stories of the structure-function relationship
Christian Stald Skoven, Mariam Andersson, … Tim B. Dyrby·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- In-vivo estimation of axonal morphology from MRI and EEG data
Rita Oliveira, Andria Pelentritou, … Antoine Lutti·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2022