Sign in
NeuroscienceNeuroImage
Peer-reviewed journal article

A representative reference for MRI-based human axon radius assessment using light microscopy

Laurin MordhorstiD, Maria Morozova, Sebastian PapazoglouiD, Björn FrickeiD, Jan Malte OeschgeriD, Thibault TabariniD, Henriette RuschiD, Carsten JägeriD, Stefan GeyeriD, Nikolaus WeiskopfiD, Markus MorawskiiD, Siawoosh MohammadiiD

Abstract

Non-invasive assessment of axon radii via MRI bears great potential for clinical and neuroscience research as it is a main determinant of the neuronal conduction velocity. However, there is a lack of representative histological reference data on the scale of the cross-section of MRI voxels for validating the MRI-visible, effective radius (reff). Because the current gold standard stems from neuroanatomical studies designed to estimate the frequency-weighted arithmetic mean radius (rarith) on small ensembles of axons, it is unsuited to estimate the tail-weighted reff. We propose CNN-based segmentation on high-resolution, large-scale light microscopy (lsLM) data to generate a representative reference for reff. In a human corpus callosum, we assessed estimation accuracy and bias of rarith and reff. Furthermore, we investigated whether mapping anatomy-related variation of rarith and reff is confounded by low-frequency variation of the image intensity, e.g., due to staining heterogeneity. Finally, we analyzed the potential error due to outstandingly large axons in reff. Compared to rarith, reff was estimated with higher accuracy (normalized-root-mean-square-error of reff: 7.2 %; rarith: 21.5 %) and lower bias (normalized-mean-bias-error of reff: -1.7 %; rarith: 16 %). While rarith was confounded by variation of the image intensity, variation of reff seemed anatomy-related. The largest axons contributed between 0.9 % and 3 % to reff. In conclusion, the proposed method accurately estimates reff at MRI voxel resolution across a human corpus callosum sample. Further investigations are required to assess generalization to brain areas with different axon radii ensembles.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
8
FWCI
0.71
Field percentile
top 38%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISDrakesmith '19Andersson '20Lee '19Lee '23Skoven '25Oliveira '22
72% semantic matchNeuroscience
Mark Drakesmith, Robbert Harms, Suryanarayana Umesh Rudrapatna+3 more·NeuroImage·Sep 19, 2019· 82 citations