Fishing for a reelGene: evaluating gene models with evolution and machine learning
Aimee J SchulziD, Jingjing ZhaiiD, Taylor AuBuchon‐ElderiD, Carson M. AndorfiD, Mohamed El-WalidiD, Taylor H. FerebeeiD, Elizabeth H. GilmoreiD, Matthew B. HuffordiD, Lynn JohnsoniD, Elizabeth Anne KelloggiD, Thuy LaiD, Evan M. LongiD, Sarah J. McMorrowiD, Zachary R. MilleriD, John L. PortwoodiD, M. Cinta RomayiD, Arun Somwarpet SeetharamiD, Michelle C. StitzeriD, Margaret Roth WoodhouseiD, Travis WrightsmaniD, Edward S. BuckleriD, Brandon MonieriD, Sheng‐Kai HsuiD
Abstract
Assembled genomes and their associated annotations have transformed our study of gene function. However, each new assembly generates new gene models. Inconsistencies between annotations likely arise from biological and technical causes, including pseudogene misclassification, transposon activity, and intron retention from sequencing of unspliced transcripts. To evaluate gene model predictions, we developed reelGene, a pipeline of machine learning models focused on (1) transcription boundaries, (2) mRNA integrity, and (3) protein structure. The first two models leverage sequence characteristics and evolutionary conservation across related taxa to learn the grammar of conserved transcription boundaries and mRNA sequences, while the third uses conserved evolutionary grammar of protein sequences to predict whether a gene can produce a protein. Evaluating 1.8 million gene models in maize, reelGene found that 28% were incorrectly annotated or nonfunctional. By leveraging a large cohort of related species and through learning the conserved grammar of proteins, reelGene provides a tool for both evaluating gene model accuracy and genome biology.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Field percentile
- top 15%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- OMGene: Mutual improvement of gene models through optimisation of evolutionary conservation
Michael P. Dunne, Steven L. Kelly·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 27, 2018
- On the automatic annotation of gene functions using observational data and phylogenetic trees
George G. Vega Yon, Duncan C. Thomas, … Paul Marjoram·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2021
- gFACs: Filtering, analysis, and conversion to unify genome annotations across alignment and gene prediction frameworks.
Madison Caballero, Jill Wegrzyn·Genomics Proteomics & BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2019
- Combining RNA-seq data and homology-based gene prediction for plants, animals and fungi
Jens Keilwagen, Frank Hartung, … Jan Grau·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 29, 2018
- Longest protein, longest transcript or most expression, for accurate gene reconstruction of transcriptomes?
Don Gilbert·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2019
- GeneCAD: Plant Genome Annotation with a DNA Foundation Model
Zong-Yan Liu, Ana Berthel, … Jingjing Zhai·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2025