Nature CommunicationsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
An information content principle explains regulatory patterns of gene expression across human tissues
Ruthie GolombiD, Maayan Yoles, Simon FishilevichiD, Bar CoheniD, Sapir Savariego Peled, Dvir Dahary, David GokhmaniD, Yitzhak PilpeliD
Abstract
Gene expression patterns range from broadly expressed housekeeping genes to highly tissue-specific ones. Notably, many genes exhibit intermediate specificity, characterized by elevated expression in some tissues while low or absent in others. Understanding how regulatory demands scale with tissue specificity offers a valuable opportunity to uncover fundamental principles of genome regulation. By analyzing cis-regulatory element (CRE) counts across human genes with varying tissue specificity, we observed a nonlinear pattern: genes with intermediate specificity harbor the highest CRE count, suggesting distinct regulatory strategies across the expression spectrum. Motivated by this observation, we used the Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle from information theory, together with a maximum parsimony approach from phylogenetics, to quantify regulatory demands across tissues. Our analysis revealed that MDL-based regulatory demand scales consistently with diverse regulatory features, including CRE count, transcription-factor and microRNA targeting, and gene structure. To test whether this scaling changes across the expression spectrum, we partitioned genes by expression breadth. Two patterns emerged: features scaling with MDL in selectively expressed genes tend to act as on/off switches, whereas those in ubiquitous genes serve as fine-tuning knobs. Evolutionary analysis revealed that these regulatory patterns vary with gene age, with alignment between MDL and CRE counts peaking in intermediate-aged genes. Collectively, these results establish MDL combined with maximum parsimony as a powerful framework linking regulatory architecture, expression specificity, and evolutionary age, offering novel insights into the organizational principles underlying genome regulation.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Understanding Tissue-specific Gene Regulation
Abhijeet R. Sonawane, John Platig, … Marieke L. Kuijjer·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2017
- LINE elements are a reservoir of regulatory potential in mammalian genomes
Maša Roller, Ericca L. Stamper, … Paul Flicek·bioRxiv·May 31, 2020
- Complexity and conservation of regulatory landscapes underlie evolutionary resilience of mammalian gene expression
Camille Berthelot, Diego Villar, … Paul Flicek·Nature Ecology & EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Nov 24, 2017
- Tissue-specific profiling reveals distinctive regulatory architectures for ubiquitous, germline and somatic genes
Jacques Serizay, Yan Dong, … Julie Ahringer·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2020
- Coexpression reveals conserved mechanisms of transcriptional cell identity
Megan Crow, Hamsini Suresh, … Jesse A Gillis·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2020
- Gene specificity landscapes for comparative transcriptomic analysis across tissues, cell types, and species
Erik Bot, José Dávila-Velderrain·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2025