skDER & CiDDER: two scalable approaches for microbial genome dereplication
Abstract
An abundance of microbial genomes have been sequenced in the past two decades. For fundamental comparative genomic investigations, where the goal is to determine the major gain and loss events shaping the pangenome of a species, it is often unnecessary and computationally onerous to include all available genomes in studies. In addition, over-representation of specific lineages due to sampling and sequencing bias can have undesired effects on evolutionary analyses. To assist users with genomic dereplication, selecting a subset of representative genomes, for downstream comparative genomic investigations, we developed skDER & CiDDER (https://github.com/raufs/skDER). skDER combines recent advances to efficiently estimate average nucleotide identity (ANI) between thousands of microbial genomes with two efficient algorithms for genomic dereplication. Further, CiDDER implements an approach whereby protein clusters are determined across all genomes and genomes are iteratively selected as representatives until a user-defined saturation of the total protein space is achieved. To support ease of use, several auxiliary functionalities are implemented within the two programs, including arguments to: (i) test the number of representative genomes resulting from a variety of clustering parameters, (ii) automate downloading of genomes belonging to a bacterial species or genus by name, (iii) cluster non-representative genomes to their closest representative genomes, and (iv) automatically filter predicted plasmids and phages prior to dereplication. We further assess the effects of filtering mobile genetic elements (MGEs) on ANI and alignment fraction (AF) estimates between pairs of genomes and find that MGEs tend to slightly deflate both metrics in one species. DATA SUMMARYskDER and CiDDER are provided as open-source software implemented in Python and C++ on Github: https://github.com/raufs/skDER; with version updates tracked on Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/138877101. Installation of the software is supported via both Bioconda2 and Docker. Additional code and data for analyses presented in this manuscript can be found on Zenodo at: https://zenodo.org/records/138918003. Pre-computed representative genomes selected by skDER (v1.0.7) for 18 common bacterial taxonomic groups, referencing classifications from GTDB release 2144, are also provided on Zenodo at: https://zenodo.org/records/100412035. IMPACT STATEMENTDue to the increased availability of genomes for certain microbial species, performing fundamental comparative genomic investigations has become restricted to those with access to more advanced computational infrastructure. Genomic dereplication, the process of selecting distinct representative genomes to capture the breadth of a taxonomic group, thus presents a valuable solution to overcome this embarrassment of riches. Specifically, genomic dereplication allows simplifying the scale of comparative investigations while minimizing the risk of biasing analyses to specific lineages, which might be overrepresented in genomic databases. We present here two programs for genomic dereplication, one based on ANI-inference, skDER, and the other based on assessing the saturation of total coding-genes sampled, CIDDER. These tools are implemented with a variety of auxiliary options and designed for ease of use.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Field percentile
- top 13%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Addressing dereplication crisis: Taxonomy-free reduction of massive genome collections using embeddings of protein content
Adrian Viehweger, Martin Hoelzer, Christian Brandt·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2019
- dRep: A tool for fast and accurate genome de-replication that enables tracking of microbial genotypes and improved genome recovery from metagenomes
Matthew R. Olm, Christopher T. Brown, … Jillian F. Banfield·The ISME JournalPeer-reviewed·Jul 25, 2017
- To dereplicate or not to dereplicate?
J. T. Evans, V. J. Denef·mSpherePeer-reviewed·Jun 24, 2020
- ReferenceSeeker: rapid determination of appropriate reference genomes
Oliver Schwengers, Torsten Hain, … Alexander Goesmann·The Journal of Open Source SoftwarePeer-reviewed·Feb 4, 2020
- Enhancing genome recovery across metagenomic samples using MAGmax
Arangasamy Yazhini, Johannes Söding·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 26, 2025
- ToRQuEMaDA: Tool for Retrieving Queried Eubacteria, Metadata and Dereplicating Assemblies
Raphaël R. Léonard, Marie Leleu, … Denis Baurain·PeerJPeer-reviewed·May 5, 2021