Sign in
BioinformaticsMicrobial Genomics
Peer-reviewed journal article

skDER & CiDDER: two scalable approaches for microbial genome dereplication

Rauf SalamzadeiD, Aamuktha Kottapalli, Lindsay KalaniD

Abstract

An abundance of microbial genomes have been sequenced in the past two decades. For fundamental comparative genomic investigations, where the goal is to determine the major gain and loss events shaping the pangenome of a species, it is often unnecessary and computationally onerous to include all available genomes in studies. In addition, over-representation of specific lineages due to sampling and sequencing bias can have undesired effects on evolutionary analyses. To assist users with genomic dereplication, selecting a subset of representative genomes, for downstream comparative genomic investigations, we developed skDER & CiDDER (https://github.com/raufs/skDER). skDER combines recent advances to efficiently estimate average nucleotide identity (ANI) between thousands of microbial genomes with two efficient algorithms for genomic dereplication. Further, CiDDER implements an approach whereby protein clusters are determined across all genomes and genomes are iteratively selected as representatives until a user-defined saturation of the total protein space is achieved. To support ease of use, several auxiliary functionalities are implemented within the two programs, including arguments to: (i) test the number of representative genomes resulting from a variety of clustering parameters, (ii) automate downloading of genomes belonging to a bacterial species or genus by name, (iii) cluster non-representative genomes to their closest representative genomes, and (iv) automatically filter predicted plasmids and phages prior to dereplication. We further assess the effects of filtering mobile genetic elements (MGEs) on ANI and alignment fraction (AF) estimates between pairs of genomes and find that MGEs tend to slightly deflate both metrics in one species. DATA SUMMARYskDER and CiDDER are provided as open-source software implemented in Python and C++ on Github: https://github.com/raufs/skDER; with version updates tracked on Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/138877101. Installation of the software is supported via both Bioconda2 and Docker. Additional code and data for analyses presented in this manuscript can be found on Zenodo at: https://zenodo.org/records/138918003. Pre-computed representative genomes selected by skDER (v1.0.7) for 18 common bacterial taxonomic groups, referencing classifications from GTDB release 2144, are also provided on Zenodo at: https://zenodo.org/records/100412035. IMPACT STATEMENTDue to the increased availability of genomes for certain microbial species, performing fundamental comparative genomic investigations has become restricted to those with access to more advanced computational infrastructure. Genomic dereplication, the process of selecting distinct representative genomes to capture the breadth of a taxonomic group, thus presents a valuable solution to overcome this embarrassment of riches. Specifically, genomic dereplication allows simplifying the scale of comparative investigations while minimizing the risk of biasing analyses to specific lineages, which might be overrepresented in genomic databases. We present here two programs for genomic dereplication, one based on ANI-inference, skDER, and the other based on assessing the saturation of total coding-genes sampled, CIDDER. These tools are implemented with a variety of auxiliary options and designed for ease of use.

PDFDOICodeData

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISViehweger '19Olm '17Evans '20Schwengers '20Yazhini '25Léonard '21
64% semantic matchBioinformatics