bioRxivScientific Communication & EducationPreprint
Unlocking the microblogging potential for science and medicine
A. Sarkar, A. Giros, L. Mockly, J. Moore, A. Moore, A. Nagareddy, B. Fu, A. Fiscutean, K. Chhugani, N. Darci-Maher, Y. Patel, V. Sarwal, Y. Chang, S. Ginjala, L. X. Garmire, R. Bao, S. Sankararaman, R. Chikhi, S. Mangul
Abstract
Microblogging platform Twitter allows researchers to showcase their work, receive constructive feedback, find jobs, and build scientific collaborations. While existing literature has analyzed the benefits of Twitter in the development and distribution of scientific knowledge, most of the studies only took into account a limited number of researchers, which affected the generalizability of derived results. Our study analyzed the activity of 6,000 biomedical scientists on Twitter using data-driven approaches, a third of whom were female. Furthermore, we estimated that up to a quarter of the members of the scientific community are engaged on Twitter. While the number of male scientists joining the microblogging platform every year has decreased, the number of female scientists has remained roughly the same. Scientists are very selective in who they are following as compared to the general public. We also found that the type of tweets and retweets one posts may affect the number of followers, specifically, that a moderate to high level of professionalism and a high level of positivity is correlated with followers count. Moreover, female scientists send fewer negative tweets as compared to male scientists (31.1% for females and 34.7% for males). Our analysis could provide insights and launch a conversation on the advantages and limitations of using Twitter for disseminating scientific information and engaging in constructive discussion and collaborations within the scientific community.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Twitter and Mastodon presence of highly-cited scientists
M. Siebert, L. M. Siena, J. P. A. Ioannidis·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2023
- Controlled experiment finds no detectable citation bump from Twitter promotion
T. Branch, I. M. C?te, … A. L. Wild·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2023
- Quantifying and contextualizing the impact of bioRxiv preprints through social media audience segmentation
J. Carlson, K. Harris·PLOS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 22, 2020
- To Tweet or Not to Tweet, That is the Question: A Randomized Trial of Twitter Effects on Article Engagement in Medical Education
L. A. Maggio, T. C. Leroux, A. R. Artino·bioRxiv·May 20, 2019
- Social media at metabolic meetings: who is tweeting what and for whom?
J. H. Nurse·bioRxiv·Aug 16, 2022
- Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists
Y. Barel-Ben David, E. S. Garty, A. Baram-Tsabari·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2019