henhaobio
Sign in

Advanced Healthcare MaterialsBioengineeringPeer-reviewed journal article

Cortical Response to Acute Implantation of the Utah Optrode Array in Macaque Cortex

Adrián Villamarin‐OrtiziD, Christopher F. ReicheiD, Frederick FedereriD, Andrew M. ClarkiD, John David RolstoniD, Cristina Soto‐SáncheziD, Eduardo FernándeziD, Steve BlairiD, Alessandra AngelucciiD

PDFDOIPreprint
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
22th percentile

Abstract

Optogenetics has transformed the study of neural circuit function, but limitations in its application to species with large brains, such as non-human primates (NHPs), remain. A major challenge in NHP optogenetics is delivering light to sufficiently large volumes of deep neural tissue with high spatiotemporal precision, without simultaneously affecting superficial tissue. To overcome these limitations, we recently developed and tested in vivo in NHP cortex, the Utah Optrode Array (UOA). This is a 10x10 array of penetrating glass shanks, tiling a 4x4mm2 area, bonded to interleaved needle-aligned and interstitial {micro}LED arrays, which allows for independent photostimulation of deep and superficial brain tissue. Here, we investigate the acute biological response to UOA implantation in NHP cortex, with the goal of optimizing device design for reduced insertion trauma and subsequent chronic response. To this goal, we systematically vary UOA shank diameter, surface texture, tip geometry, and insertion pressure, and assess their effects on astrocytes, microglia, and neuronal viability, following acute implantation. We find that UOAs with shanks of smaller diameter, smooth surface texture and round tips cause the least damage. Higher insertion pressures have limited effects on the inflammatory response, but lead to greater tissue compression. Our results highlight the importance of balancing shank diameter, tip geometry, and insertion pressure in UOA design for preserving tissue integrity and improving long-term UOA performance and biocompatibility.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISClark '24McAlinden '24Azadi '23Rajalingham '21Greer '26Patel '22
85% semantic matchNeuroscience
Andrew M. Clark, Alexander Ingold, Christopher F. Reiche+11 more·Communications Biology·Mar 14, 2024· 29 citations