An integrated genome-wide resource reveals distinct replication environments of DNA breakage in human cancer cell lines
Boyu DingiD, Li-Chin WangiD, Lorenzo CorazziiD, Marco GiaisiiD, Victoria MariniiD, Lumír KrejčíiD, Diala Shatleh, Rami I. AqeilaniD, Pei‐Chi WeiiD
Abstract
Replication stress is a major source of genome instability in cancer, yet the genomic features that determine where DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) arise remain incompletely defined. Here, we establish an integrated genome-wide resource of DSBs, DNA replication, replication timing, transcription, and R-loops in two widely used cancer cell lines, U2-OS and HeLa, under steady-state conditions and following prolonged low-dose DNA polymerase inhibition. We combine these datasets with systematic statistical testing and comparative analytical approaches to define the replication environments associated with genome fragility. Endogenous DSBs preferentially accumulated at origin-rich initiation zones, where R-loops were enriched, whereas prolonged DNA polymerase inhibition redirected DSB formation toward origin-poor, late-replicating regions. Among the replication features examined, replication initiation zones and late-replicating areas were most sensitive to prolonged replication stress. R-loops were specifically enriched at initiation zones but depleted from late-replicating regions and recurrent DNA break clusters (RDCs), demonstrating that their association with genome fragility is context dependent. Replication stress further induced RDCs within long, actively transcribed genes, while their locations only partially overlapped with common fragile sites. Functional analyses identified MUS81 as a major regulator of RDC formation. MUS81 loss increased RDCs, whereas restoration of its catalytic activity suppressed them, indicating that MUS81 resolves replication intermediates before they persist into late-replicating fragile regions. Together, this resource and analytical framework provide a systematic basis for dissecting how replication architecture, transcription, and DNA processing shape genome fragility in cancer cells.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Integrated analysis of patterns of DNA breaks reveals break formation mechanisms and their population distribution during replication stress
Yingjie Zhu, Anna Biernacka, … Maga Rowicka·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2017
- Replication Timing and Transcription Identifies a Novel Fragility Signature Under Replication Stress
Dan Sarni, Takayo Sasaki, … Batsheva Kerem·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2019
- DNA Replication Modulates R-loop Levels to Maintain Genome Stability
S. Hamperl, J. C. Saldivar, … K. A. Cimprich·bioRxiv·Jun 26, 2017
- Low replication stress leads to specific replication timing advances associated to chromatin remodelling in cancer cells
L. Courtot, E. Bournique, … V. Bergoglio·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2020
- Break-induced replication drives large-scale genomic amplifications in cancer cells
Mouadh Benamar, Rebeka Eki, … Tarek Abbas·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2024
- Linear Interaction Between Replication and Transcription Shapes DNA Break Dynamics at Recurrent DNA Break Clusters
Lorenzo Corazzi, Vivien S. Ionasz, … Pei‐Chi Wei·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 27, 2024