Finite Sample Adjustments for Average Equivalence Testing
Y. Boulaguiem, J. Quartier, M. Lapteva, Y. N. Kalia, M.-P. Victoria-Feser, S. Guerrier, D.-L. Couturier
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWAverage (bio)equivalence tests are used to assess if a parameter, like the mean difference in treatment response between two conditions for example, lies within a given equivalence interval, hence allowing to conclude that the conditions have equivalent means. The Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) procedure, consisting in testing whether the target parameter is respectively significantly greater and lower than some pre-defined lower and upper equivalence limits, is typically used in this context, usually by checking whether the confidence interval for the target parameter lies within these limits. This intuitive and visual procedure is however known to be conservative, especially in the case of highly variable drugs, where it shows a rapid power loss, often reaching zero, hence making it impossible to conclude for equivalence when it is actually true. Here, we propose a finite sample correction of the TOST procedure, the -TOST, which consists in a correction of the significance level of the TOST allowing to guarantee a test size (or type-I error rate) of . This new procedure essentially corresponds to a finite sample and variability correction of the TOST procedure. We show that this procedure is uniformly more powerful than the TOST, easy to compute, and that its operating characteristics outperform the ones of its competitors. A case study about econazole nitrate deposition in porcine skin is used to illustrate the benefits of the proposed method and its advantages compared to other available procedures.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Optimal sample size calculation for null hypothesis significance tests
Joseph F. Mudge, Jeffrey E. Houlahan·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2019
- A variant of the student’s t-test for data of varying reliability
Suril B Sheth, Bhavin R. Sheth·bioRxiv·Jan 21, 2019
- Beyond accuracy, precision and TAE: Direct assay validation against product specification aligned with USP
Davor Josipovic·The AAPS JournalPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2025
- We need to talk about reliability: Making better use of test retest studies for study design and interpretation
Granville James Matheson·PeerJPeer-reviewed·May 24, 2019
- Reporting and justification of sample size in translational chronic variable stress procedures: A systematic review
Crispin Y. Jordan, Nicola Romanò, John R. W. Menzies·Experimental PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 9, 2025
- Statistical analysis of no observed effect concentrations or levels in eco-toxicological assays with overdispersed count endpoints
L. A. Hothorn, F. M. Kluxen·bioRxiv·Jan 15, 2020