Sign in
ImmunologybioRxiv
Preprint

Resolving sialylated N Glycans and immune cell landscapes using a unified same-section IMC-MSI workflow

Jake GrineriD, Reto GerberiD, Mark D. RobinsoniD, Carsten KriegiD, Silvia GugliettaiD

Abstract

Integrating antibody-based imaging with mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) on the same formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue section offers powerful opportunities for multimodal spatial analysis but remains analytically challenging due to cross-platform chemical and physical interference. In particular, chemically aggressive on-tissue derivatization strategies required for isomer-resolved glycan MSI may compromise downstream antibody detection. Here, we systematically evaluate the analytical compatibility and acquisition order of imaging mass cytometry (IMC) and sialic-acid-linkage-resolving N-glycan MALDI-MSI using an Amidation-Activation-X-Linkage (AAXL) derivatization strategy on the same FFPE tissue section. Two same-section workflows were compared: AAXL-MALDI MSI followed by IMC (MALDI-first) and IMC followed by AAXL-MALDI MSI (IMC-first). We find that AAXL-first processing results in severe and widespread loss of IMC anti-body signal across epithelial, immune, and nuclear markers, rendering subsequent antibody-based analysis unreliable. In contrast, IMC-first acquisition preserves quantitative antibody performance while maintaining spatial glycan distributions, relative abundance structure, and isomer-specific signal integrity in downstream AAXL-MALDI MSI. Using high-precision co-registration, we further demonstrate that IMC-first sequencing enables analytically robust integration of IMC and MSI data at both domain and pixel levels. These results establish IMC-first acquisition as the preferred same-section strategy for workflows combining antibody imaging with chemically intensive, isomer-resolved glycan MSI and provide generalizable guidance for the design of multimodal spatial mass spectrometry experiments.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.