The Influence of Blood Collection Tubes in Biomarkers Screening by Mass Spectrometry
S. Zhang, Z. Zhao, W. Duan, Z. li, Z. Nan, H. Du, M. Wang, J. Yang, C. Huang
Abstract
BackgroundMass spectrometry (MS) is one of the rapidly developing bio-analytical techniques in recent years and have found many biomarkers of variety of disease. Whereas pre-analytical process is one of most crucial procedure which would significantly influence the results of biomarkers screening. In the current study, we conducted a pilot analysis of serum to determine the effects of blood collection tubes in biomarkers screening.\n\nMethodsMagnetic bead separation and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry were used for qualitative analysis of healthy control and serum cancer patients. A total of 24 serum samples were analyzed in this study, of which were collected from patients or healthy control using non-additive tubes or coagulant activator tubes respectively. ClinProTools were used to compare the difference among the different groups.\n\nResultsThe results demonstrated that no matter for patients or normal people, the serum protein profile changed significantly when using coagulant tubes. We also found that the effect of coagulant on serum protein of patients was smaller than that of control group. There were significant differences among 27 peaks which were obtained in the control group and the control coagulant group. However, between patient group and patient coagulant group, only 1 differential peak were obtained. Coagulant changed the protein expression difference in the original serum, and the difference expanded, narrowed even reversed, most of which are small polypeptides (Mass<3000 Da), which significantly changed the results of biomarkers screening. The results showed that 19 potential biomarkers could be found with non-additive tubes and 16 potential biomarkers could be found with coagulate activator tubes, among which only 6 were the same.\n\nConclusionsThe choice of blood collection tube significantly influence the results of biomarkers screening by MS.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessment of a high-throughput mass spectrometry method to accelerate biomarker discovery in clinical cancer cohorts using volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) devices.
Natasha Lucas, Cameron J. Hill, … Elisabeth Karsten·bioRxiv·Oct 10, 2024
- Multiplexed triage of candidate biomarkers in plasma using internal standard triggered-parallel reaction monitoring mass spectrometry
J. J. Kennedy, J. R. Whiteaker, … A. G. Paulovich·bioRxiv·Sep 2, 2021
- Quench me if you can: Alpha-2-macroglobulin trypsin complexes enable serum biomarker analysis by MALDI mass spectrometry
Aleksandr S. Taraskin, Konstantin K. Semenov, … Yana A. Zabrodskaya·BiochimiePeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2021
- Quality control of blood plasma for mass-spectrometry proteomic research
Anastasia V. Vakaryuk, Ivan Butenko, … Vadim Markovich Govorun·bioRxiv·Jan 16, 2026
- Paradigm shift in biomarker translation: a pipeline to generate clinical grade biomarker candidates from DIA-MS discovery
Qin Fu, Manasa Vegesna, … Jennifer E. Van Eyk·Angewandte ChemiePeer-reviewed·Oct 21, 2024
- Affinity-mass spectrometric technologies for quantitative proteomics in biological fluids
Huiyan Li, Robert Popp, Christoph H. Borchers·TrAC Trends in Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Mar 2, 2017