ACS Synthetic BiologySynthetic BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Systematic Mapping of Bacterial CRISPRa Design Rules and Implications for Synergistic Gene Activation
Cholpisit KiattiseweeiD, Ava V. KaranjiaiD, Ryan A. L. CardiffiD, Kira E. OlanderiD, Pansa LeejareoniD, Sarah AlviiD, James M. CarothersiD, Jesse G. ZalataniD
Abstract
CRISPR gene activation (CRISPRa) tools have shown great promise for bacterial strain engineering but often require customization for each intended application. Our goal is to create generalizable CRISPRa tools that can overcome previous limitations of gene activation in bacteria. In eukaryotic cells, multiple activators can be combined for synergistic gene activation. To identify potential effectors for synergistic activation in bacteria, we systematically characterized bacterial activator proteins with a set of engineered synthetic promoters. We found that optimal target sites for different activators could vary by up to 200 bases in the region upstream of the transcription start site (TSS). These optimal target sites qualitatively matched previous reports for each activator, but the precise targeting rules varied between different promoters. By characterizing targeting rules in the same promoter context, we were able to test activator combinations with each effector positioned at its optimal target site. We did not find any activator combinations that produced synergistic activation, and we found that many combinations were antagonistic. This systematic investigation highlights fundamental mechanistic differences between bacterial and eukaryotic transcriptional activation systems, and suggests that alternative strategies will be necessary for strong bacterial gene activation at arbitrary endogenous targets.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: CRISPR screen
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Field percentile
- top 30%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Uncovering the distinct properties of a bacterial type I-E CRISPR activation system
Maria Claudia Villegas Kcam, Annette J. Tsong, James Chappell·ACS Synthetic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2022
- Programmable and portable CRISPR-Cas transcriptional activation in bacteria
Hsing‐I Ho, Jennifer R. Fang, … Harris H. Wang·Molecular Systems BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2020
- Effective CRISPRa-Mediated Control of Gene Expression in Bacteria Must Overcome Strict Target Site Requirements
Jason T. Fontana, Chen Dong, … Jesse G. Zalatan·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2020
- Modeling predicts that CRISPR-based activators, unlike CRISPR-based repressors, scale well with increasing gRNA competition and dCas9 bottlenecking
Samuel E. Clamons, Richard M. Murray·bioRxiv·Aug 13, 2019
- Expanding the scope of bacterial CRISPR activation with PAM-flexible dCas9 variants
Cholpisit Kiattisewee, Ava V. Karanjia, … Jesse G. Zalatan·ACS Synthetic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 15, 2022
- Emergent properties in complex synthetic bacterial promoters
Lummy Maria Oliveira Monteiro, Letícia Arruda, Rafael Silva‐Rocha·ACS Synthetic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2017