Transplanting enzyme active site geometry into antibody CDRs for catalytic antibody design
Abstract
Antibodies provide programmable molecular recognition, whereas enzymes enable repeated chemical transformation. Catalytic antibodies seek to combine these properties within a single protein scaffold. However, conventional approaches based on transition state analogue immunisation, library screening or local mutagenesis provide limited control over the atomic arrangement of catalytic residues. They also frequently produce antibodies that bind substrates without supporting efficient chemical turnover. Recent advances in generative protein design have enabled the construction of antibody complementarity determining regions and the scaffolding of functional motifs under structural constraints. A systematic strategy for transferring experimentally supported enzyme active site geometry into antibody variable domains is still lacking. Here, we present a computational framework that treats antibody and enzyme structures as distinct but complementary inputs. Developable Fv or VHH structures provide the immunoglobulin scaffold. Enzyme complexes containing substrates, products or transition state analogues provide catalytic residues, ligand conformations, metals, cofactors and key water networks. The selected catalytic atoms are mapped into antibody complementarity determining regions, while the surrounding loops are reconstructed using antibody compatible representations and constrained all atom diffusion. Sequence design and structural back prediction are followed by filters for antibody folding, catalytic geometry, ligand positioning, conformational stability and developability. The framework avoids direct fusion of intact enzymes and antibodies. Instead, it transfers only the local geometry required for catalysis. This separation of scaffold selection from catalytic motif selection creates a testable route for determining whether natural enzyme chemistry can be embedded within antibody formats. It also provides a practical basis for evaluating substrate binding, chemical conversion, product release and catalytic turnover as separate design objectives. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=91 SRC="FIGDIR/small/740676v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (45K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2cc629org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@185d7e4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@20f810org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7e045b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Complex enzyme active site scaffolding by iteratively detuned catalytic guidance
Tingli Qian, Weijin Wang, … David A. Baker·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2026
- Combinatorial assembly and design of enzymes
R. Lipsh-Sokolik, O. Khersonsky, … S. J. Fleishman·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2022
- Computational enzyme design by catalytic motif scaffolding
Markus Braun, Adrian Tripp, … Gustav Oberdorfer·NaturePeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2025
- Interplay of stability and dynamics in the optimization of a highly proficient de novo enzyme
Sagar Bhattacharya, Gessica M. Adornato, … William F. DeGrado·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2026
- Computational remodeling of an enzyme conformational landscape for altered substrate selectivity
A. D. St-Jacques, J. M. Rodriguez, … R. A. Chica·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2022
- Computational design of serine hydrolases
Anna Lauko, Samuel J. Pellock, … David A. Baker·SciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 13, 2025