Integrative Gene and Isoform Co-expression Networks Reveal Regulatory Rewiring in Stress-related Psychiatric Disorders
Ghalia RehawiiD, Jonas HagenbergiD, BeCOME study group, OPTIMA study group, Philipp G. Sämann, Lambert MoyoniD, Elisabeth Binder, Markus ListiD, Annalisa MarsicoiD, Janine ArlothiD
Abstract
Isoform-specific expression patterns have been implicated in stress-related psychiatric disorders like major depressive disorder (MDD), yet the extent of their involvement and their interrelationships remain unclear. We constructed co-expression networks for individuals affected (n=210, 81% with depressive symptoms) and unaffected (n=95) by stress-related psychiatric disorders. We incorporated total gene expression (TE) and isoform ratio (IR) data and validated the inferred networks using advanced graph generation techniques. Our analysis revealed distinct network topology and structure between the two groups. Investigation of the 127 shared hubs (degree >= 10) found that these hubs exhibit co-regulatory patterns unique to each network. The affected individuals network also contained 61 hub nodes with a minimum absolute fold increase of two in connectivity compared to the unaffected individuals network. Notably, 49% of these hubs showed evidence for association with psychiatric disorders. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis revealed distinct biological processes associated with hubs, such as mRNA processing for affected and immune response and cell adhesion for unaffected individuals. Enrichment analysis of GWAS loci further supported network-specific findings. Analysis of the isoform-specific nodes showed distinct protein-protein interactions compared to gene-level analysis. This is the first study to demonstrate network-level differences in gene and isoform co-expression patterns between individuals with and without stress-related psychiatric disorders, with a particular focus on depressive symptoms. Our findings provide evidence for substantial rewiring of gene regulatory networks in affected individuals. Incorporating isoform-level data revealed a deeper level of complexity, highlighting the importance of considering isoform variations in understanding the molecular basis of these conditions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 13th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Brain Region-Specific Gene Co-expression Networks Reveal Neuroinflammation and ER Stress Signatures in Major Depressive Disorder
Lin Li, Meiqi Wang, Yanbing Jie·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2025
- Differential and spatial expression meta-analysis of genes identified in genome-wide association studies of depression
Wennie Wu, Derek Howard, … Leon French·Translational PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Jan 4, 2021
- Decoding shared versus divergent transcriptomic signatures across cortico-amygdala circuitry in PTSD and depressive disorders
Andrew E. Jaffe, Ran Tao, … Joel E. Kleinman·American Journal of PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2022
- Transcriptomic Organization of Human Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Matthew J. Girgenti, Jiawei Wang, … Ronald S. Duman·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2020
- Brain network and blood transcriptomic correlations underpin psychopathological phenotypes: A Preliminary Study
Dennis Wylie, Dhivya Arasappan, … Mbemba Jabbi·medRxiv·Jul 8, 2025
- A systematic analysis of genetically regulated differences in gene expression and the role of co-expression networks across 16 psychiatric disorders and substance use phenotypes
Zachary F. Gerring, Jackson G. Thorp, … Eske M. Derks·bioRxiv·Jan 28, 2021