Localization and function of key axonemal microtubule inner proteins and dynein docking complex members reveal extensive diversity among vertebrate motile cilia

Abstract

Vertebrate motile cilia are broadly classified as (9+2) or (9+0), based on the presence or absence of the central pair apparatus, respectively. Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) analyses of (9+2) cilia have uncovered an elaborate axonemal protein composition; whether these features are relevant to (9+0) cilia remain unclear. We previously demonstrated that Cfap53, a key microtubule inner protein (MIP) as well as centriolar-satellites component, is essential for motility of (9+0), but not (9+2) cilia. Here, we show that in (9+2) cilia, Cfap53 functions redundantly with a paralogous MIP, Mns1. Mns1 localizes to ciliary axonemes, and combined loss of both proteins in zebrafish and mice, caused severe loss of outer dynein arms (ODAs) of (9+2) cilia, significantly affecting their motility. Moreover, using immunoprecipitation, we demonstrate that while Mns1 can self-associate and interact with Cfap53, Cfap53 is unable to self-associate. Finally, we show that multiple additional dynein interacting proteins, such as the ODA docking complex (ODA-DC) members, show strikingly distinct localization patterns between various motile cilia-types. Our findings clarify how paralogous MIPs, Cfap53 and Mns1, function in regulating motility of (9+2) versus (9+0) cilia, and establish that localization pattern of other key motility proteins also differ between these cilia-types, further emphasizing extensive structural variations among these organelles.