Automated plasmid design for marker-free genome editing in budding yeast
Lazar Stojković, Vojislav GligorovskiiD, Mahsa Geramimanesh, Marco LabagnaraiD, Sahand Jamal RahiiD
Abstract
The ease of genome editing has contributed to the popularity of budding yeast as a model organism. However, the palette of selectable markers is in principle limited as most can only be used once. Some markers such as URA3 and TRP1 can be recycled through counterselection. This permits seamless genome modification with pop-in/pop-out (PIPO), in which a DNA construct first integrates in the genome and, subsequently, homologous regions recombine and excise undesired sequences. Popular approaches for creating such constructs use oligonucleotides and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The drawbacks are that long oligonucleotides are unstable, can form secondary structures that interfere with PCR, cannot be regenerated in a typical biological laboratory, and are only widely available for lengths less than about 120, which limits the homology and efficiency that can be attained. With the rapid reduction in price, synthesizing custom DNA sequences in specific plasmid backbones has become an appealing alternative. For designing plasmids for seamless PIPO gene tagging or deletion, there are a number of factors to consider. To create only the shortest DNA sequences necessary, avoid errors in manual design, specify the amount of homology desired, and customize restriction sites, we created the computational tool PIPOline. Using it, we tested the ratios of homology that improve pop-out efficiency when targeting the genes HTB2 or WHI5. We supply optimal PIPO plasmid sequences for tagging or deleting almost all S288C budding yeast open reading frames (ORFs). Finally, we demonstrate how the histone variant Htb2 marked with a red fluorescent protein can be used as a cell-cycle stage marker, alternative to superfolder GFP (sfGPF), reducing light toxicity. We expect PIPOline to streamline genome editing in budding yeast.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Field percentile
- top 31%
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Simple-to-use CRISPR-SpCas9/SaCas9/AsCas12a vector series for genome editing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Satoshi Okada, Goro Doi, … Takashi Ito·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 30, 2021
- LOBSTERS: a modular vector series with a diverse set of Cas nucleases and plasmid selection markers for multiplex genome editing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Satoshi Okada, Emiko Kusumoto, … Takashi Ito·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2025
- MOSAIC: a highly efficient, one-step recombineering approach to plasmid editing and diversification
Marijn van den Brink, Timotheus Y. Althuis, … Nico J. Claassens·ACS Synthetic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 5, 2025
- A cloning-free method for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in fission yeast
Xiaoran Zhang, Jia-Bei He, … Li‐Lin Du·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 27, 2018
- Rapid CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing in S. cerevisiae
Hosein Rostamian, Ethan W. Madden, … Brian D. Strahl·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2026
- Extreme miniaturization in plasmid design: generation of the 903 bp cloning vector pICOt2
Jens Staal, Rudi Beyaert·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2023