eLifeNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Binary and analog variation of synapses between cortical pyramidal neurons
Sven DorkenwaldiD, Nicholas L. TurneriD, Thomas MacrinaiD, Kisuk LeeiD, Ran LuiD, Jingpeng WuiD, Ágnes L. BodoriD, Adam BleckertiD, Derrick BrittainiD, Nico KemnitziD, William SilversmithiD, Dodam IhiD, Jonathan ZungiD, Aleksandar ZlateskiiD, Ignacio TartavulliD, Szi-chieh YuiD, Sergiy PopovychiD, William Wong, Manuel CastroiD, Chris S. JordaniD, Alyssa Michelle WilsoniD, Emmanouil FroudarakisiD, JoAnn BuchananiD, Marc M. TakenoiD, Russel TorresiD, , H. Sebastian SeungiD
- Citations
- 130
- FWCI
- 9.27
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Abstract
Learning from experience depends at least in part on changes in neuronal connections. We present the largest map of connectivity to date between cortical neurons of a defined type (L2/3 pyramidal cells), which was enabled by automated analysis of serial section electron microscopy images with improved handling of image defects. We used the map to identify constraints on the learning algorithms employed by the cortex. Previous cortical studies modeled a continuum of synapse sizes (Arellano et al. 2007) by a log-normal distribution (Loewenstein, Kuras, and Rumpel 2011; de Vivo et al. 2017; Santuy et al. 2018). A continuum is consistent with most neural network models of learning, in which synaptic strength is a continuously graded analog variable. Here we show that synapse size, when restricted to synapses between L2/3 pyramidal cells, is well-modeled by the sum of a binary variable and an analog variable drawn from a log-normal distribution. Two synapses sharing the same presynaptic and postsynaptic cells are known to be correlated in size (Sorra and Harris 1993; Koester and Johnston 2005; Bartol et al. 2015; Kasthuri et al. 2015; Dvorkin and Ziv 2016; Bloss et al. 2018; Motta et al. 2019). We show that the binary variables of the two synapses are highly correlated, while the analog variables are not. Binary variation could be the outcome of a Hebbian or other synaptic plasticity rule depending on activity signals that are relatively uniform across neuronal arbors, while analog variation may be dominated by other influences. We discuss the implications for the stability-plasticity dilemma.
- organism: mouse
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Whole-neuron synaptic mapping reveals local balance between excitatory and inhibitory synapse organization
Daniel Maxim Iascone, Yujie Li, … Franck Polleux·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2018
- A calcium-based plasticity model predicts long-term potentiation and depression in the neocortex
Giuseppe Chindemi, Marwan Abdellah, … Eilif Benjamin Muller·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2022
- Large-scale algorithmic search identifies stiff and sloppy dimensions in synaptic architectures consistent with murine neocortical wiring
Tarek Jabri, Jason N. MacLean·Neural ComputationPeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2022
- Heterogeneous firing responses predict diverse couplings to presynaptic activity in mice layer V pyramidal neurons
Yann Zerlaut, Alain Destexhe A·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 14, 2017
- Neural oligarchy: how synaptic plasticity breeds neurons with extreme influence
Florence I. Kleberg, Jochen Triesch·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2018
- Distinct in vivo dynamics of excitatory synapses onto cortical pyramidal neurons and inhibitory interneurons
Joshua B. Melander, Aran Nayebi, … Haining Zhong·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2021