Evolutionarily new genes in humans with disease phenotypes reveal functional enrichment patterns shaped by adaptive innovation and sexual selection.
J. Chen, P. Landback, D. Arsala, A. Guzzetta, S. Xia, J. Atlas, D. Sosa, Y. Zhang, J. Cheng, B. Shen, M. Long
Abstract
New genes (or young genes) are genetic novelties pivotal in mammalian evolution. However, their phenotypic impacts and evolutionary patterns over time remain elusive in humans due to the technical and ethical complexities of functional studies. Integrating gene age dating with Mendelian disease phenotyping, our research shows a gradual rise in disease gene proportion as gene age increases. Logistic regression modeling indicates that this increase in older genes may be related to their longer sequence lengths and higher burdens of deleterious de novo germline variants (DNVs). We also find a steady integration of new genes with biomedical phenotypes into the human genome over macroevolutionary timescales ([~]0.07% per million years). Despite this stable pace, we observe distinct patterns in phenotypic enrichment, pleiotropy, and selective pressures across gene ages. Notably, young genes show significant enrichment in diseases related to the male reproductive system, indicating strong sexual selection. Young genes also exhibit disease-related functions in tissues and systems potentially linked to human phenotypic innovations, such as increased brain size, musculoskeletal phenotypes, and color vision. We further reveal a logistic growth pattern of pleiotropy over evolutionary time, indicating a diminishing marginal growth of new functions for older genes due to intensifying selective constraints over time. We propose a "pleiotropy-barrier" model that delineates higher potentials for phenotypic innovation in young genes compared to older genes, a process that is subject to natural selection. Our study demonstrates that evolutionarily new genes are critical in influencing human reproductive evolution and adaptive phenotypic innovations driven by sexual and natural selection, with low pleiotropy as a selective advantage.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pleiotropy increases with gene age in six model multicellular eukaryotes
Reese A. Martin, Ann Thomas Tate·Evolution LettersPeer-reviewed·Aug 4, 2025
- Functional determinants and evolutionary consequences of pleiotropy in complex and Mendelian traits
Yury A. Barbitoff, Поліна Богайчук, … Alexander V. Predeus·Molecular Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2025
- Why do we get sick? Genetic evidence for evolutionary trade-offs between fertility, longevity, and disease
Eva Brigos-Barril, Claudia Vasallo, … Gerard Muntané·medRxiv·Jun 18, 2025
- Patterns of recent natural selection on genetic loci associated with sexually differentiated human body size and shape phenotypes
A. M. Arner, K. E. Grogan, … G. H. Perry·bioRxiv·Jun 17, 2020
- Decreased adaptation at human disease genes as a possible consequence of interference between advantageous and deleterious variants
C. Di, D. Salazar Tortosa, … D. Enard·bioRxiv·Mar 31, 2021
- New genes and functional innovation in mammals
J. L. Villanueva-Canas, J. Ruiz-Orera, … M. M. Alba·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2017