A signalling rheostat controls chromosome segregation fidelity during early lineage specification and neurogenesis by modulating DNA replication stress
A. de Jaime Soguero, J. Hattemer, A. Haas, A. Bufe, B. Di Marco, N. Bohly, J. J. M. Landry, B. Schoell, V. S. Rosa, L. Villacorta, Y. Baskan, S. Androulaki, M. Trapp, V. Benes, B. Das, M. Shahbazi, A. Jauch, U. Engel, A. Patrizi, R. Sotillo, J. Bageritz, J. Alfonso, H. Bastians, S. P. Acebron
Abstract
The development and homeostasis of organisms rely on the correct replication, maintenance and segregation of their genetic blueprints. How these intracellular processes are monitored across generations of different human cellular lineages, and why the spatio-temporal distribution of mosaicism varies during development remain unknown. Here, we identify several lineage specification signals that regulate chromosome segregation fidelity in both human and mouse pluripotent stem cells. Through epistatic analyses, we find that that WNT, BMP and FGF form a signalling "rheostat" upstream of ATM that monitors replication fork velocity, origin firing and DNA damage during S-phase in pluripotency, which in turn controls spindle polymerisation dynamics and faithful chromosome segregation in the following mitosis. Cell signalling control of chromosome segregation fidelity declines together with ATM activity after pluripotency exit and specification into the three human germ layers, or further differentiation into meso- and endoderm lineages, but re-emerges during neuronal lineage specification. In particular, we reveal that a tug-of-war between FGF and WNT signalling in neural progenitor cells results in DNA damage and chromosome missegregation during cortical neurogenesis, which could provide a rationale for the high levels of mosaicism in the human brain. Our results highlight a moonlighting role of morphogens, patterning signals and growth factors in genome maintenance during pluripotency and lineage specification, which could have important implications for our understanding on how mutations and aneuploidy arise during human development and disease. One sentence summaryDevelopmental signals link genome maintenance to cell fate
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Wnt10b signaling regulates replication stress-induced chromosomal instability in human cancer
Alexander Haas, Friederike Wenz, … Holger Bastians·Life Science AlliancePeer-reviewed·Aug 22, 2025
- Developmental regulation of kinetochore phosphorylation determines mitotic fidelity
Brian Galaviz Sarmiento, Duane A. Compton, Kristina M. Godek·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2026
- Brain biomechanics governs mitotic fidelity of embryonic neural progenitors
Véronique Marthiens, Clara Basto, … Renata Basto·bioRxiv·Jul 31, 2025
- A Pluripotent Developmental State Confers a Low Fidelity of Chromosome Segregation
- Wnt signaling recruits KIF2A to the spindle to ensure chromosome congression and alignment during mitosis
A. Bufe, A. Garcia del Arco, … S. P. Acebron·bioRxiv·Dec 22, 2020
- Physiological re-replication during human stem cell differentiation
Marie Minet, Amila Beganovic, … Ulrike Fischer·Cell Death DiscoveryPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2026