bioRxivCancer BiologyPreprint
Overcoming Resistance to Anabolic Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator (SARM) Therapy in Experimental Cancer Cachexia with Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor AR-42
Yu-Chou Tseng, Sophia G. Liva, Anees M. Dauki, Michael Sovic, Sally E. Henderson, Yi-Chiu Kuo, Jason A. Benedict, Samuel K. Kulp, Moray Campbell, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Mitchell A. Phelps, Ching-Shih Chen, Christopher C. Coss
Abstract
PurposeThe common colon-26 mouse (C-26) model of experimental cachexia mimics recent late stage clinical failures of anabolic anti-cachexia therapy, and does not respond to the anabolic selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) GTx-024. Based on the demonstrated anti-cachectic efficacy of the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) AR-42 in this model, we hypothesized that combined SARM/AR-42 would provide improved anti-cachectic efficacy.\n\nDesignIn the C-26 model, we determined a reduced efficacious dose of AR-42 which was combined with anabolic SARM therapy and evaluated for anti-cachectic efficacy. The effects of treatment and tumor burden on anabolic and catabolic signaling occurring in skeletal muscle were characterized using muscle performance parameters and RNA-seq.\n\nResultsAnabolic anti-cachexia therapy with diverse androgens had no impact on cachectic outcomes in the C-26 model. A reduced dose of the HDACi AR-42 alone provided limited anti-cachectic benefits, but when combined with the SARM GTx-024, significantly improved bodyweight (p<0.0001), hind limb muscle mass (p<0.05), and voluntary grip strength (p<0.0001) versus tumor-bearing controls. Reduced-dose AR-42 treatment suppressed the IL-6/GP130/STAT3 signaling axis without significantly impacting circulating cytokine levels. GTx-024-mediated {beta}-catenin target gene regulation was apparent in cachectic mice only when combined with AR-42.\n\nConclusionsCachectic signaling in the C-26 model is comprised of catabolic signaling insensitive to anabolic GTx-024 therapy and a blockade of GTx-024-mediated anabolic signaling. AR-42 treatment mitigates catabolic gene activation and restores anabolic responsiveness to GTx-024. Combining GTx-024, a clinically established anabolic therapy, with a low dose of AR-42, a clinically evaluated HDACi, represents a promising approach to improve anabolic response in cachectic patient populations.
- organism: mouse
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: cancer & tumor microenvironment
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Combined AMPK activation and ghrelin ameliorate cancer cachexia through complementary effects on energy homeostasis, inflammation, and wasting
Valentina González-Álvarez, S Caamaño-Teixeira, … Rosa María Señarís·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2026
- Furan fatty acid supplementation protects against muscle atrophy during cancer cachexia
Anaïs Deglos, Jennifer Falconi, … François Casas·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2026
- GHSR-1a is not Required for Ghrelin's Anti-inflammatory and Fat-sparing Effects in Cancer Cachexia
- C26 and CT26 colorectal cancer models exhibit divergent cachexia phenotypes, intramuscular inflammation, and protein turnover signaling
Xinyue Lu, Hanan Tlais, … James F. Markworth·bioRxiv·Apr 24, 2026
- The systemic activin response to pancreatic cancer: Implications for effective cancer cachexia therapy
X. Zhong, M. Pons, … T. A. Zimmers·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2018
- NAD+ repletion with niacin counteracts cancer cachexia
Marc Beltrà, Noora Pöllänen, … Fabio Penna·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 3, 2023