bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Life without mismatch repair
Mathijs Arnoud SandersiD, Harald S. VöhringeriD, Victoria J. ForsteriD, Luiza MooreiD, Brittany B. Campbell, Yvette E. Hooks, Melissa EdwardsiD, Vanessa BianchiiD, Tim H. H. CoorensiD, Timothy M. ButleriD, Henry Lee-SixiD, Philip S. RobinsoniD, Christoffer FlensburgiD, Rebecca A. Bilardi, Ian J. MajewskiiD, Agnes ReschkeiD, Elizabeth CairneyiD, Bruce CrooksiD, Scott LindhorstiD, Duncan S. StearnsiD, Patrick TombociD, Ultan McDermottiD, Michael R. StrattoniD, Adam ShlieniD, Moritz GerstungiD, , Peter J. CampbelliD
Abstract
Mismatch repair (MMR) is a critical defence against mutation, but we lack quantification of its activity on different DNA lesions during human life. We performed whole-genome sequencing of normal and neoplastic tissues from individuals with constitutional MMR deficiency to establish the roles of MMR components, tissue type and disease state in somatic mutation rates. Mutational signatures varied extensively across genotypes, some coupled to leading-strand replication, some to lagging-strand replication and some independent of replication, implying that the various MMR components engage different forms of DNA damage. Loss of MSH2 or MSH6 (MutS), but not MLH1 or PMS2 (MutL), caused 5-methylcytosine-dependent hypermutation, indicating that MutS is the pivotal complex for repairing spontaneous deamination of methylated cytosines in humans. Neoplastic change altered the distribution of mutational signatures, particularly accelerating replication-coupled indel signatures. Each component of MMR repairs 1-10 lesions/day per normal human cell, and many thousands of additional events during neoplastic transformation. HighlightsO_LIMMR repairs 1-10 lesions/day in every normal cell and thousands more in tumor cells C_LIO_LIMMR patterns and rates are shaped by genotype, tissue type and malignant transformation C_LIO_LIMSH2 and MSH6 are pivotal for repairing spontaneous deamination of methylated cytosine C_LIO_LIReplication indels and substitutions vary by leading versus lagging strand and genotype C_LI
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 23
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deficiency in DNA mismatch repair of methylation damage is a major mutational process in cancer
Fang Hu, Xiaoqiang Zhu, … Jason W.H. Wong·bioRxiv·Nov 18, 2020
- Dissecting DNA-mismatch-repair-driven mutational processes in human cells
Michel Owusu, Jörg Menche, … Donate Weghorn·bioRxiv·Feb 10, 2025
- Human mismatch repair system corrects errors produced during lagging strand replication more effectively
Maria Andrianova, Georgii A Bazykin, … Vladimir Seplyarskiy·bioRxiv·Mar 23, 2016
- Single-cell whole-genome sequencing reveals mutational landscapes of DNA mismatch repair deficiency in mouse primary fibroblasts
- Mbd4 and MutSα protect cells from spontaneous deamination of 5-methylcytosine.
Rebecca A. Bilardi, Christoffer Flensburg, … Ian J. Majewski·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Dec 19, 2025
- MutLα suppresses error-prone DNA mismatch repair and preferentially protects noncoding DNA from mutations
Lyudmila Y. Kadyrova, Piotr A. Mieczkowski, Farid A. Kadyrov·Journal of Biological ChemistryPeer-reviewed·May 21, 2024