Clonally selected lines after CRISPR/Cas editing are not isogenic
Arijit PandaiD, Milovan ŠuvakoviD, Jessica MarianiiD, Kristen L. DruckeriD, Yohan ParkiD, Yeongjun JangiD, Thomas M. KollmeyeriD, Gobinda SarkariD, Taejeong BaeiD, Ji‐Eun KimiD, Wan Hee YooniD, Robert Brian JenkinsiD, Flora Maria VaccarinoiD, Alexej S. AbyzoviD
Abstract
The CRISPR-Cas9 system has enabled researchers to precisely modify/edit the sequence of a genome. A typical editing experiment consists of two steps: (i) editing cultured cells; (ii) cell cloning and selection of clones with and without intended edit, presumed to be isogenic. The application of CRISPR-Cas9 system may result in off-target edits, while cloning will reveal culture-acquired mutations. We analyzed the extent of the former and the latter by whole genome sequencing in three experiments involving separate genomic loci and conducted by three independent laboratories. In all experiments we hardly found any off-target edits, while detecting hundreds to thousands of single nucleotide mutations unique to each clone after relatively short culture of 10-20 passages. Notably, clones also differed in copy number alterations that were several kb to several mb in size and represented the largest source of genomic divergence among clones. We suggest that screening of clones for mutations and copy number alterations acquired in culture is a necessary step to allow correct interpretation of DNA editing experiments. Furthermore, since culture associated mutations are inevitable, we propose that experiments involving derivation of clonal lines should compare a mix of multiple unedited lines and a mix of multiple edited lines.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Field percentile
- top 23%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The genomes of precision edited cloned calves show no evidence for off-target events or increased de novo mutagenesis
Swati Jivanji, Chad Harland, … Götz Laible·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2021
- An approach for accelerated isolation of genetically manipulated cell clones with reduced clonal variability
- CRISPR-Cas9 induces large structural variants at on-target and off-target sites in vivo that segregate across generations
Ida Höijer, Anastasia Emmanouilidou, … Adam Ameur·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 2, 2022
- In vivo CRISPR-Cas gene editing with no detectable genome-wide off-target mutations
Pınar Akçakaya, Maggie L. Bobbin, … J. Keith Joung·NaturePeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2018
- Corrigendum and follow-up: Whole genome sequencing of multiple CRISPR-edited mouse lines suggests no excess mutations.
Kellie A. Schaefer, Benjamin W Darbro, … Vinit B. Mahajan·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2018
- High-throughput robotic isolation of human iPS cell clones reveals frequent homozygous induction of identical genetic manipulations by CRISPR-Cas9
Gou Takahashi, Minato Maeda, … Yuichiro Miyaoka·Stem Cell Research & TherapyPeer-reviewed·Jun 7, 2025