henhaobio
Sign in

BMC GenomicsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article

The genomes of precision edited cloned calves show no evidence for off-target events or increased de novo mutagenesis

Swati JivanjiiD, Chad HarlandiD, Sally ColeiD, Brigid BrophyiD, Dorian J. GarrickiD, Russell G. SnelliD, Mathew D. LittlejohniD, Götz LaibleiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Animal health and welfare are at the forefront of public concern and the agricultural sector is responding by prioritising the selection of welfare-relevant traits in their breeding schemes. In some cases, welfare-enhancing traits such as horn-status (i.e., polled) or diluted coat colour, which could enhance heat tolerance, may not segregate in breeds of primary interest, highlighting gene-editing tools such as the CRISPR-Cas9 technology as an approach to rapidly introduce variation into these populations. A major limitation preventing the acceptance of CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene-editing, however, is the potential for off-target mutagenesis, which has raised concerns about the safety and ultimate applicability of this technology. Here, we present a clone-based study design that has allowed a detailed investigation of off-target and de novo mutagenesis in a cattle line bearing edits in the PMEL gene for diluted coat-colour. No off-target events were detected from high depth whole genome sequencing performed in precursor cell-lines and resultant calves cloned from those edited and non-edited cell lines. Long molecule sequencing at the edited site and plasmid-specific PCRs did not reveal structural variations and/or plasmid integration events in edited samples. Furthermore, an in-depth analysis of de novo mutations across samples revealed that the mutation frequency and spectra were unaffected by editing status. Cells in culture, however, had a distinct mutation signature where de novo mutations were predominantly C>A mutations, and in cloned calves they were predominantly T>G mutations, deviating from the expected excess of C>T mutations. We conclude that the gene-edited cells and calves in this study did not present a higher mutation load than unedited controls. Cell culture and somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning processes contributed the major source of contrast in mutational profile between samples.

Citations
11
FWCI
0.63
Field percentile
top 38%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.