Chronos: a CRISPR cell population dynamics model
Joshua M. DempsteriD, Isabella BoyleiD, Francisca VázqueziD, David E. RootiD, Jesse S. BoehmiD, William C. HahniD, Aviad TsherniakiD, James M. McFarlandiD
Abstract
CRISPR loss of function screens are a powerful tool to interrogate cancer biology but are known to exhibit a number of biases and artifacts that can confound the results, such as DNA cutting toxicity, incomplete phenotype penetrance and screen quality bias. Computational methods that more faithfully model the CRISPR biological experiment could more effectively extract the biology of interest than typical current methods. Here we introduce Chronos, an algorithm for inferring gene knockout fitness effects based on an explicit model of the dynamics of cell proliferation after CRISPR gene knockout. Chronos is able to exploit longitudinal CRISPR data for improved inference. Additionally, it accounts for multiple sources of bias and can effectively share information across screens when jointly analyzing large datasets such as Project Achilles and Score. We show that Chronos outperforms competing methods across a range of performance metrics in multiple types of experiments.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 44
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Abstract summary
Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Chronos infers gene knockout fitness effects by explicitly modelling cell proliferation dynamics after knockout, using longitudinal readouts and correcting several known screen biases.
CRISPR loss-of-function screens carry biases and artifacts - toxicity from DNA cutting, incomplete penetrance of the knockout phenotype, and screen quality bias - that confound their results. Chronos instead fits an explicit dynamic model of how a cell population grows after knockout, which the authors present as a closer match to the real experiment than typical current methods.
Key results
ClaimedChronos is reported to give better gene fitness estimates than existing CRISPR screen scoring methods across several performance metrics and several experiment types.
The abstract asserts the advantage over competing methods but names no comparators, metrics or effect sizes in this text. · Abstract
ClaimedThe dynamic formulation lets Chronos exploit longitudinal CRISPR screen data, which the authors say improves inference.
Stated as exploiting longitudinal CRISPR data for improved inference; no quantified gain is reported in this text. · Abstract
ClaimedThe same model absorbs multiple bias sources and pools information between screens when many screens are fitted jointly, as in the Project Achilles and Score collections.
Stated as a property of the algorithm; no bias-correction or joint-analysis benchmark is reported in this text. · Abstract
Methods, data and reproducibility
An algorithm, Chronos, that infers gene knockout fitness effects from an explicit model of cell population proliferation dynamics following CRISPR knockout, able to use longitudinal screen measurements, account for multiple sources of bias, and fit many screens jointly across large datasets such as Project Achilles and Score.
- Large CRISPR loss-of-function screen datasets named as examples for joint analysis (Project Achilles, Score)
- Methods & tools
- Chronos, Project Achilles, Score
Limitations (2)
- No numbers, baseline method names or datasets sizes accompany the performance claim in the available text, so the margin over existing scoring methods cannot be judged. · noted in this summary
- The individual components (cutting toxicity, penetrance, screen quality, information sharing) are asserted rather than evaluated separately here. · noted in this summary
Who should read:Read this if you analyse CRISPR loss-of-function screens and want an explicit proliferation-dynamics model instead of typical current scoring methods.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Controlling False Discovery in CRISPR Screens
Joshua M. Dempster, Barbara De Kegel, … Catarina D. Campbell·bioRxiv·Apr 24, 2025
- ShrinkCRISPR : A flexible method for differential fitness analysis of CRISPR-Cas9 screen data.
Renaud Tissier, Janne J. M. van Schie, … Renée de Menezes·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 3, 2023
- A benchmark of computational methods for correcting biases of established and unknown origin in CRISPR-Cas9 screening data
Alessandro Vinceti, Raffaele M Iannuzzi, … Francesco Iorio·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2024
- Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens
Antoine de Weck, Javad Golji, … Audrey Kauffmann·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2018
- CRISPulator: A Discrete Simulation Tool For Pooled Genetic Screens
Tamas L Nagy, Martin Kampmann·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 21, 2017
- A model for accurate quantification of CRISPR effects in pooled FACS screens
Harold Pimentel, Jacob W. Freimer, … Jonathan K. Pritchard·bioRxiv·Jun 17, 2024