Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens
Antoine de WeckiD, Javad Golji, Michael D. JonesiD, Joshua M. KorniD, Éric BillyiD, E. Robert McDonaldiD, Tobias SchmelzleiD, Hans BitteriD, Audrey KauffmanniD
Abstract
Cell autonomous cancer dependencies are now routinely identified using CRISPR loss-of-function screens. However, a bias exists that makes it difficult to assess the true essentiality of genes located in amplicons, since the entire amplified region can exhibit lethal scores. These false-positive hits can either be discarded from further analysis, which in cancer models can represent a significant number of hits, or methods can be developed to rescue the true-positives within amplified regions. We propose two methods to rescue true positive hits in amplified regions by correcting for this copy number artefact. The Local Drop Out (LDO) method uses the relative lethality scores within genomic regions to assess true essentiality and does not require additional orthogonal data (e.g. copy number value). LDO is meant to be used in screens covering a dense region of the genome (e.g. a whole chromosome or the whole genome). The General Additive Model (GAM) method models the screening data as a function of the known copy number values and removes the systematic effect from the measured lethality. GAM does not require the same density as LDO, but does require prior knowledge of the copy number values. Both methods have been developed with single sample experiments in mind so that the correction can be applied even in smaller screens. Here we demonstrate the efficacy of both methods at removing the copy number effect and rescuing hits from some of the amplified regions. We estimate a 70-80% decrease of false positive hits in regions of high copy number with either method.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 22
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Unsupervised correction of gene-independent cell responses to CRISPR-Cas9 targeting
Francesco Iorio, Fiona M. Behan, … Mathew J. Garnett·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Aug 13, 2018
- Reducing False Positives in CRISPR/Cas9 Screens from Copy Number Variations
Alexander Wu, Tengfei Xiao, … Wei Li·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2018
- Computational correction of copy-number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells
Robin M. Meyers, Jordan Bryan, … Aviad Tsherniak·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2017
- Recovering false negatives in CRISPR fitness screens with JLOE
Merve Dede, Traver Hart·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2023
- CRISPRcleanR WebApp: an interactive web application for processing genome-wide pooled CRISPR-Cas9 viability screen
Alessandro Vinceti, Riccardo Roberto De Lucia, … Francesco Iorio·Cell Reports MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023
- A benchmark of computational methods for correcting biases of established and unknown origin in CRISPR-Cas9 screening data
Alessandro Vinceti, Raffaele M Iannuzzi, … Francesco Iorio·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2024