GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Starve-Feed Cycles Direct Quiescence to Proliferation Transitions in Drosophila Follicle Stem Cells via Transcriptional Regulation
Eric H. LeeiD, Jacqueline C. Simonet, Daniel ZinshteyniD, Zhen FuiD, Saranya Ananth, Catharine Wingle, Ebony R. Dyson, Brendan Russell, Ruthie M Njagi, Gabrielle N StillsiD, Damiya Ringgold, Aminah JohnsoniD, Arslie Louis-Jacques, Gabriel VaughniD, Maxwell Saurman, Dara M. Ruiz-WhaleniD, Jennifer I. AlexanderiD, Yan ZhouiD, Alana M. O’ReillyiD
Abstract
Stem cell quiescence is a reversible state in which cells temporarily exit the cell cycle but remain poised to reenter, on cue. Robust protection of the balance between stem cell quiescence and proliferation (Q->P) is critical for long-term tissue health. Proliferation without proper resources drives disease states including cancer or birth defects. Conversely, extended periods of quiescence can lead to irreversible senescence, causing stem cell loss, aging symptoms, and vulnerability to oncogenic transformation. Diet is a central regulator of Q->P. Tissue stem cells are particularly impacted, entering periods of quiescence during nutrient restriction, with rapid induction of proliferation upon feeding. We demonstrated previously that the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway is necessary and sufficient for controlling Q->P responses to dietary changes in epithelial Follicle Stem Cells (FSCs) in the fly ovary. The Hh effector, Cubitus Interruptus (Ci), is a transcriptional regulator that mediates the feeding response. To identify Ci-induced Q->P regulators, we labeled transcripts that are induced in FSCs during the 6-hour Q->P timecourse using thiouracil tagging (TU-tagging), and sequenced TU-tagged messages versus Input to prioritize candidates. Unexpectedly, cell cycle regulators were not induced, suggesting that other mechanisms control Q->P in FSCs. We describe a sequential screening approach that uncovered seven novel, feeding-dependent Q->P regulators, including a cholesterol transporter and, surprisingly, glial and neuronal regulators. Our results highlight the importance of dynamic regulation of gene expression for translation of dietary signals by stem cells, uncovering new pathways for mechanistic investigation.
- organism: Drosophila
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Field percentile
- top 19%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Interactions between axon-like projections extended by Drosophila Follicle Stem Cells dictate cell fate decisions
Eric H. Lee, Daniel Zinshteyn, … Alana M. O’Reilly·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2020
- Regulation of somatic stem cell precursor fates and proliferation during Drosophila melanogaster pupal ovary development resembles the signaling framework for adult stem cell behavior
Rachel Misner, Amy R. Reilein, … Daniel Kalderon·bioRxiv·May 8, 2025
- Spatial regulation of Drosophila ovarian Follicle Stem Cell division rates and cell cycle transitions
David Melamed, Aaron Choi, … Daniel Kalderon·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 25, 2023
- Micromanagment of stem cell proliferation by the Drosophila testis stem cell niche
Eugene A. Albert, Olga A. Puretskaia, … Christian Bökel·DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Jul 12, 2018
- H2AK119ub dynamics controls hair follicle stem cell quiescence
Pooja Flora, Meng-Yen Li, … Elena Ezhkova·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2025
- Homeostatic control of stem cell activity during intestinal regeneration.
Shichao Yang, Changsheng Luo, … Jun Zhou·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2026