Sign in
BioinformaticseLife
Peer-reviewed journal article

Competitive coordination of the dual roles of the Hedgehog co-receptor in homophilic adhesion and signal reception

Shu YangiD, Ya ZhangiD, Chuxuan Yang, Xuefeng WuiD, Sara El OudiD, Rongfang Chen, Xudong CaiiD, Xufeng WuiD, Ganhui LaniD, Xiaoyan ZhengiD

Abstract

Hedgehog (Hh) signaling patterns embryonic tissues and contributes to homeostasis in adults. In Drosophila, Hh transport and signaling are thought to occur along a specialized class of actin-rich filopodia, termed cytonemes. Here, we report that Interference hedgehog (Ihog) not only forms a Hh receptor complex with Patched to mediate intracellular signaling, but Ihog also engages in trans-homophilic binding leading to cytoneme stabilization in a manner independent of its role as the Hh receptor. Both functions of Ihog (trans-homophilic binding for cytoneme stabilization and Hh binding for ligand sensing) involve a region of the first fibronectin repeat of the extracellular domain. Thus, the Ihog-Ihog interaction and the Hh-Ihog interaction cannot occur simultaneously for a single Ihog molecule. By combining experimental data and mathematical modeling, we determined that Hh-Ihog heterophilic interaction dominates and Hh can disrupt and displace Ihog molecules involved in trans-homophilic binding. Consequently, we proposed that the weaker Ihog-Ihog trans interaction promotes and stabilizes direct membrane contacts along cytonemes and that, as the cytoneme encounters secreted Hh ligands, the ligands trigger release of Ihog from trans Ihog-Ihog complex enabling transport or internalization of the Hh ligand-Ihog-Patched -receptor complex. Thus, the seemingly incompatible functions of Ihog in homophilic adhesion and ligand binding cooperate to assist Hh transport and reception along the cytonemes. One-sentence summaryApparently incompatible functions of Ihog in homophilic adhesion and ligand binding cooperate in Hh transport and reception.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
12
FWCI
0.63
Field percentile
top 39%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.