bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Replication fork directionality reveals how structural variants arise under replication stress
Dominik GłodzikiD, Mathilda RigbyiD, Michail AndreopoulosiD, Jake CrawfordiD, Shannon R. Ehmsen, Avraam TapinosiD, Alex Cornish, Richard S. HoulstoniD, David C. WedgeiD, Ralph ScullyiD, Peter J. ParkiD
Abstract
Structural variants (SVs) in cancer are associated with defects in DNA repair and replication stress, but the mechanisms generating common SV types remain unresolved. We propose that large (>100 kb) tandem duplications originate through a novel sister-fork breakage-fusion mechanism. To capture replication-related context beyond breakpoints, we developed an algorithm to characterize replication timing, origin density, and fork direction across SV-spanned regions, features that refine and differentiate previously defined SV signatures. Large tandem duplications frequently overlap replication origins from which forks proceed bidirectionally; combined with independent evidence from APOBEC strand asymmetry, this pattern is compatible uniquely with the proposed mechanism. Although tandem duplications in CCNE1-amplified and CDK12-mutant cancers also concentrate around origins and highly transcribed genes, they display distinct contexts: CDK12-mutant SVs arise near later-firing origins, whereas those in CCNE1-amplified tumors often coincide with genes in specific strand configurations, suggesting different causes of fork stalling. Incorporating replication features into signature analysis enabled the discovery of new SV signatures, which we used to build SVIG, a multi-class classifier of SV phenotypes. SV signatures attributed to replication stress may help guide therapies targeting this vulnerability.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Patterns of structural variation in human cancer
Yilong Li, Nicola D Roberts, … and the PCAWG Network·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2017
- The impact of mutational processes on structural genomic plasticity in cancer cells
T. Funnell, C. H. O'Flanagan, … S. Aparicio·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2021
- DNA replication errors drive genome-wide small inverted triplication dynamics
Yi Lei, Yu Zhou, … Binghui Shen·Advanced SciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 7, 2026
- Somatic structural variants driving distinct modes of oncogenesis in melanoma
J. M. Conway, R. Gillani, … E. Van Allen·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2023
- Cell-cycle dependent DNA repair and replication unifies patterns of chromosome instability
Bingxin Lu, Samuel Winnall, … Chris P. Barnes·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2025
- POLQ mediates replication-stress induced structural variant formation throughout common fragile sites during mitosis
Thomas E. Wilson, Samreen Ahmed, … Thomas W. Glover·bioRxiv·May 28, 2024