bioRxivPharmacology & Toxicology
Impact of efavirenz, ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and nevirapine based antiretroviral regimens on the pharmacokinetics of lumefantrine and safety of artemether-lumefantrine in falciparum-negative HIV-infected Malawian adults stabilized on antiretroviral therapy
C. G. Banda, F. K. Dzinjalamala, M. Mukaka, J. Mallewa, V. Maiden, D. J. Terlouw, D. G. Lalloo, S. Khoo, V. Mwapasa
Abstract
There is conflicting evidence of the impact of commonly used antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) on the pharmacokinetics of lumefantrine and safety profile of artemether-lumefantrine. We compared the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-14 days) of lumefantrine and safety profile of artemether-lumefantrine in malaria-negative human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected adults in two steps. In step 1, a half-dose adult course of artemether-lumefantrine was administered as a safety check in four groups (n = 6/group): (i) antiretroviral-naive, (ii) on nevirapine-based ART, (iii) on efavirenz-based ART and (iv) on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-based ART. In step 2, a standard-dose adult course of artemether-lumefantrine was administered to a different cohort in three groups (n = 10-15/group): (i) antiretroviral-naive, (ii) on efavirenz-based ART and (iii) on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-based ART. In step 1, lumefantrines AUC0-14 days was 53% [95% CI: 0.27-0.82] lower in the efavirenz-based ART group than the ART-naive group and was 2.4 [95% CI: 1.58-3.62] and 2.9 [95% CI: 1.75-4.72] times higher in the nevirapine and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir groups, respectively. In step 2, lumefantrines AUC0-14 days was 1.9 [95% CI: 1.26-3.00] times higher in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir group and not significantly different between the efavirenz-and ART-naive groups (0.99 [95% CI: 0.63-1.57]). Frequent cases of haematological abnormalities (thrombocytopenia and neutropenia) were observed in the nevirapine group in step 1, leading to a recommendation from the data and safety monitoring board not to include a nevirapine group in step 2. Artemether-lumefantrine was well tolerated in the other groups. The therapeutic implications of these findings need to be evaluated among HIV-malaria co-infected adults.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Drug Interactions Between Dolutegravir and Artemether-Lumefantrine or Artesunate-Amodiaquine
S. Walimbwa, M. Lamorde, … S. H. Khoo·bioRxiv·Jun 20, 2018
- Identifying a next-generation antimalarial trioxolane in a landscape of artemisinin partial resistance
Matthew T. Klope, Poulami Talukder, … Adam R. Renslo·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Aug 8, 2025
- Evidence of interaction between humoral immunity and drug half-life in determining treatment outcome for artemisinin combination therapy in high transmission settings in western Kenya
Ben M. Andagalu, Pinyi Lu, … Edwin T. Kamau·Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 13, 2022
- Effects Of Lymphocyte Trafficking on Antiretroviral Drug Distribution within the Lymph Node
Sobia Anam, Michael Donzanti, … Ryan Zurakowski·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2026
- The reconstitution of body mass index in HIV positive subjects under antiretroviral treatment in Kinshasa
G. K. Tshima·bioRxiv·Jan 18, 2019
- Retention and predictors of attrition among patients who started antiretroviral therapy in Zimbabwes National Antiretroviral Therapy Programme between 2012 and 2015
R. Makurumidze, T. Mutasa-Apollo, … S. Rusakaniko·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2019