henhaobio
Sign in

Scientific ReportsMolecular BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Long-read sequencing to detect full-length protein-protein interactions

Stephanie Schaefer‐RamadaniD, Yue Guan, Ayeda Abdulsalam Ahmed, Jovana AleksiciD, Khadija Ahmed ElmagarmidiD, Leena F. SyediD, Yasmin Ali MohamoudiD, Joel A. MalekiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Given the increased predictions on interactome size and demand for protein function information, methods for detecting protein-protein interactions remain a significant development area. The all-vs.-all sequencing (AVA-Seq) method utilizes a convergent fusion plasmid design to make two-hybrid technology amenable to next-generation sequencing. Here, we further innovate to take advantage of synthetic DNA technologies and Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read sequencing improvements to allow us to determine full-length protein-protein interactions. Here, using this approach we recovered 159 protein-protein interactions from a set of 57 human proteins using multiple forms of validation. Further, when referencing a human gold standard set of interactions, eight full-length protein-protein interactions were recovered from an expected 28 interaction pairs (28.6%), a typical recovery rate for two-hybrid technologies. The AVA-Seq, in combination with the ease of synthetic DNA production and the MinION platform, offers a low-cost, high-throughput alternative for determining protein-protein interactions, which can be utilized in research labs at all stages. 3 Key PointsO_LIFirst application of long-read sequencing for full-length protein-protein interaction studies. C_LIO_LIThe recovery rate of the AVA-Seq method using full-length proteins is on par with other leading methods. C_LIO_LIAdvances in synthetic biology and sequencing technologies make full-length protein interactomes affordable and accessible. C_LI GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=74 SRC="FIGDIR/small/586447v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (23K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d81412org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10dbb19org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@76a04borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15baf0_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Citations
1
FWCI
0.30
Field percentile
48th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISAndrews '19Schaefer‐Ra '21Baryshev '23Green '19Banerjee '20Motone '23
68% semantic matchGenomics
Simeon Andrews, Stephanie Schaefer‐Ramadan, Nayra M. Al‐Thani+3 more·Journal of Biological Chemistry·Jun 10, 2019· 8 citations