Human genetic diversity modifies therapeutic gene editing off-target potential
Samuele CancellieriiD, Jing ZengiD, Linda Yingqi LiniD, Manuel TognoniD, My Anh Nguyen, Jiecong LiniD, Nicola BombieriiD, Stacy A. Maitland, Marioara-Felicia Ciuculescu, Varun KattaiD, Shengdar Q. TsaiiD, Myriam A. ArmantiD, Scot A. WolfeiD, Rosalba GiugnoiD, Daniel E. BaueriD, Luca PinelloiD
Abstract
CRISPR gene editing holds great promise to modify somatic genomes to ameliorate disease. In silico prediction of homologous sites coupled with biochemical evaluation of possible genomic off-targets may predict genotoxicity risk of individual gene editing reagents. However, standard computational and biochemical methods focus on reference genomes and do not consider the impact of genetic diversity on off-target potential. Here we developed a web application called CRISPRme that explicitly and efficiently integrates human genetic variant datasets with orthogonal genomic annotations to nominate and prioritize off-target sites at scale. The method considers both single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels, accounts for bona fide haplotypes, accepts spacer:protospacer mismatches and bulges, and is suitable for personal genome analyses. We tested the tool with a guide RNA (gRNA) targeting the BCL11A erythroid enhancer that has shown therapeutic promise in clinical trials for sickle cell disease (SCD) and {beta}-thalassemia1. We find that the top candidate off-target site is produced by a non-reference allele common in African-ancestry populations (rs114518452, minor allele frequency (MAF)=4.5%) that introduces a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) for SpCas9. We validate that SpCas9 generates indels ([~]9.6% frequency) and chr2 pericentric inversions in a strictly allele-specific manner in edited CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), although a high-fidelity Cas9 variant mitigates this off-target. The CRISPRme tool highlights alternative allele-specific off-target editing as a prevalent risk of gRNAs considered for therapeutic gene editing. Our report illustrates how population and private genetic variants should be considered as modifiers of genome editing outcomes. We suggest that variant-aware off-target assessment should be considered in therapeutic genome editing efforts going forward and provide a powerful approach for comprehensive off-target nomination.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 124
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- CRISPR-HAWK: Haplotype- and Variant-aware Guide Design Toolkit for CRISPR-Cas
Alisa Kumbara, Manuel Tognon, … Luca Pinello·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2026
- Global-scale CRISPR gene editor specificity profiling by ONE-seq identifies population-specific, variant off-target effects
Karl Petri, Daniel Y. Kim, … Vikram Pattanayak·bioRxiv·Apr 5, 2021
- Widespread impact of natural genetic variations in CRISPR/Cas9 outcomes
- Comparative analysis of CRISPR off-target activity discovery tools following ex vivo editing of CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
M. Kyle Cromer, Kiran R. Majeti, … Matthew Hebden Porteus·Molecular TherapyPeer-reviewed·Feb 15, 2023
- EXCAVATE-HT: A Bioinformatic Pipeline to Identify Targetable Genomic Variants for Allele-Specific Editing
Akshita Saxena, Grace D. Ramey, … Bria L Macklin·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2026
- Scalable assessment of genome editing off-targets associated with genetic variants
Jiecong Lin, My Anh Nguyen, … Daniel E. Bauer·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2024