Effects of leg immobilization and recovery resistance training on skeletal muscle-molecular markers in previously resistance trained versus untrained adults

Abstract

We sought to examine how resistance training (RT) status in young healthy individuals, either well-trained (T, n=10 (8 males)) or untrained (UT, n=11 (8 males)), affected muscle size and molecular markers with leg immobilization followed by recovery RT. All participants underwent two weeks of left leg immobilization via the use of crutches and a locking leg brace. After this two-week period, all participants underwent eight weeks (3 d/week) of knee extensor focused progressive RT. Vastus lateralis (VL) ultrasound-derived thickness and muscle cross-sectional area were measured at baseline (PRE), immediately after disuse (MID), and after RT (POST) with VL muscle biopsies collected at these time points. T and UT presented lower ultrasound derived VL size (cross-sectional area and thickness) values at MID versus PRE (p[≤]0.001), and values increased in both groups from MID to POST (p<0.05); however, VL size increased from PRE to POST in UT only (p<0.001). Mean and type II myofiber cross-sectional area (fCSA) values demonstrated a main effect of time where PRE and POST were greater than MID (p<0.05) and main effect of training status where T was greater than UT (P[≤]0.012). In both groups, satellite cell number was not affected by leg immobilization but increased in response to RT (p[≤]0.014), with T being greater than UT across all time points (p=0.004). Additionally, ribosome content (total RNA) decreased (p=0.010) from PRE to MID while the endoplasmic reticulum stress proteins (BiP, Xbp1s, and CHOP) increased from MID to POST regardless of training status. Finally, the phosphorylation states of mechanistic target of rapamycin complex-1 signaling proteins were not significantly altered for either group throughout the intervention. In conclusion, immobilization-induced muscle atrophy and recovery RT hypertrophy outcomes are similar between UT and T participants, and the lack of molecular signature differences between groups supports these findings. However, these data are limited to younger adults undergoing non-complicated disuse. Thus, further investigation to determine the impact of training status on prolonged leg immobilization models mirroring current medical protocols (e.g., following orthopedic injury and surgery) is warranted.