Predicting specificity of TCR-pMHC interactions using machine learning and biophysical models
Martin CulkaiD, Nicolas LounsburyiD, William John ThriftiD, Santrupti NerliiD, Andrew WallaceiD, Gergő NikolényiiD, Darya Yu. OrlovaiD, Kiran MukhyalaiD, Mohammed AlQuraishiiD
Abstract
Understanding the mechanism of T-cell activation and T-cell receptor (TCR) discrimination of MHC-presented epitope peptides (pMHCs) remains an open problem. Machine learning (ML)-based prediction of TCR specificity has gained considerable recent attention. However, the capacity of current models to generalize to peptides unseen during training is currently unknown. Here, we use a proprietary cancer-patient data set that profiles TCR binding to novel regions of peptide space to show that peptide generalization remains an unsolved problem. Specifically, we show that while ML methods have demonstrable utility in predicting TCR specificity for known peptides, they fail to generalize to novel peptides. We also show that physics-based methods utilizing classical energy functions outperform ML methods when predicting TCR binding to novel peptides but underperform them on known peptides. In light of these observations, we develop a new ML model that leverages general knowledge acquired by protein foundation models to achieve better or comparable performance than either ML or biophysical methods on both in- and out-of-distribution TCR-pMHC specificity prediction. We furthermore analyze model performance as a function of distance of TCR sequence specificity between the training and test sets to quantitatively characterize the generalization potential of any given TCR-pMHC model. Our analysis sheds light on the status of modeling TCR-pMHC interactions and suggests new paths forward for continued method development and data acquisition.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 10.26
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Tricked by Edge Cases: Can Current Approaches Lead to Accurate Prediction of T-Cell Specificity with Machine Learning?
Martin Culka, Jonathan Desponds, … Darya Yu. Orlova·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2024
- Assessing the Generalization Capabilities of TCR Binding Predictors via Peptide Distance Analysis
L. V. Castorina, F. Grazioli, … F. Errica·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2023
- Machine learning model interpretations explain T cell receptor binding
B. Carter, J. Krog, … D. K. Gifford·bioRxiv·Aug 15, 2023
- Limitations of general protein language models and public TCRpMHC data in training specificity prediction models
Brajesh Rai, Sarah Hall-Swan·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2026
- NetTCR 2.2 - Improved TCR specificity predictions by combining pan- and peptide-specific training strategies, loss-scaling and integration of sequence similarity
Mathias Fynbo Jensen, Morten Nielsen·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 4, 2024
- TCR-H: Machine Learning Prediction of T-cell Receptor Epitope Binding on Unseen Datasets
R. R. Tatikonda, O. Demerdash, J. C. Smith·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2023