bioRxivImmunologyPreprint
Tricked by Edge Cases: Can Current Approaches Lead to Accurate Prediction of T-Cell Specificity with Machine Learning?
Martin CulkaiD, Jonathan DespondsiD, Jeanne CheungiD, Mayra Cruz Tleugabulova, Shirley Ng Palace, Martine DarwishiD, Roman A. Smirnov, Evgeniy Tabatsky, Geraldine Strasser, Andréy S. ShawiD, Ira MellmaniD, Andrei Chernyshev, Darya Yu. OrlovaiD
- Citations
- 1
Abstract
The ability to predict T cell receptor (TCR) specificity from sequence could transform immunotherapy, vaccine development, and our understanding of immune recognition. While machine learning approaches have shown promise, progress is limited by the quality of training data and underlying modeling assumptions. Historically, equilibrium binding assays using multimeric pMHCs have been a dominant source of data, but these assays often conflate high-affinity binding with true functional specificity, introducing noise into predictive models. Here, we critically examine two commonly discussed ideas in the field: that TCR specificity prediction can be separated from functional activation modeling, and that unsupervised sequence-based approaches can generalize across diverse antigen contexts. We introduce a cell-based assay for directly quantifying TCR-pMHC binding kinetics using monomeric ligands, while simultaneously assessing early activation via CD3{zeta} phosphorylation. These kinetic parameters provide a mechanistic basis for specificity that avoids the artifacts of equilibrium-based measurements. We propose a predictive modeling framework that integrates biophysical measurements with machine learning, and outline strategies for generating high-throughput training data to support this approach. Our findings highlight the need for functionally informed, mechanistically grounded models to advance generalizable TCR specificity prediction.
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: protein folding & dynamics
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
- approach: machine learning (classical)
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Predicting specificity of TCR-pMHC interactions using machine learning and biophysical models
Martin Culka, Nicolas Lounsbury, … Mohammed AlQuraishi·Cell SystemsPeer-reviewed·Aug 13, 2026
- Beyond Better Models: Barriers and a Path Forward in Generalisable TCR Antigen Specificity Prediction
Ilija Ilievski, Agne Antanaviciute, … Hashem Koohy·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2026
- Biophysical modeling for accurate T cell specificity prediction of viral and tumor antigens
Zahra S. Ghoreyshi, Noah J. Tubo, … Jason Thomas George·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 23, 2026
- TCR-H: Machine Learning Prediction of T-cell Receptor Epitope Binding on Unseen Datasets
R. R. Tatikonda, O. Demerdash, J. C. Smith·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2023
- Label Noise Limits TCR-pMHC Specificity Prediction: Improved Performance Through AlphaFold3-Based Structural Modeling and Data Denoising
Pilar Ballesteros-Cuartero, Johanne Lund, Morten Nielsen·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2026
- Machine learning model interpretations explain T cell receptor binding
B. Carter, J. Krog, … D. K. Gifford·bioRxiv·Aug 15, 2023