Tetraspanin positivity as a function of extracellular vesicle size measured by a modified immuno-TEM protocol
Pablo FagúndeziD, Álvaro OliveraiD, Olesia A. GololobovaiD, Marco Li CalziiD, Alfonso CayotaiD, Kenneth Whitaker WitweriD, Eduardo MéndeziD, Juan Pablo TosariD
Abstract
The identification of surface markers that correlate with specific subpopulations of extracellular vesicles (EVs) is important for EV identification, classification, purification, sorting, and functional analysis. Tetraspanins such as CD9, CD63 and CD81 were once considered to be universal markers of exosomes: small EVs released into the extracellular space when late endosomes / multivesicular bodies fuse with the plasma membrane. In contrast, plasma membrane-derived ectosomes (also called microvesicles) have a different biogenesis, were often regarded as being larger than exosomes, and display a different surface proteome. However, recent studies have shown that tetraspanins such as CD9 and CD81 are highly enriched on ectosomes derived from various sources. Thus, it is currently unclear how tetraspanin content correlates with specific EV subpopulations. Here, we present a modified immuno-TEM protocol that can be easily applied to heterogeneous EV populations comprising both small and large EVs (and presumably also a collection of exosomes and ectosomes). In EVs purified from U-2 OS cells by size-exclusion chromatography, we show that the percentage of particles positive for CD9 and CD81 is significantly higher in the subpopulation of EVs [≤] 100 nm (i.e., small EVs). These results also explain discrepancies in the size distribution profiles that we obtained using the same EV preparations by alternative single-vesicle characterization platforms such as nano flow cytometry and SP-IRIS / ExoView. The latter, when used to capture tetraspanin-positive particles, returns a population that is relatively small in size.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Field percentile
- top 19%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Surface marker expression in small and medium/large mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles in naive or apoptotic condition using orthogonal techniques
R. Skovronova, C. Grange, … B. Bussolati·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2021
- Multiparametric Profiling of Single Nanoscale Extracellular Vesicles by Combined Atomic Force and Fluorescence Microscopy: Correlation and Heterogeneity in Their Molecular and Biophysical Features
S. Cavallaro, F. Pevere, … A. Dev·bioRxiv·Jan 22, 2021
- Specificities of exosome versus small ectosome secretion revealed by live intracellulartracking and synchronized extracellular vesicle release of CD9 and CD63
M. Mathieu, N. Nevo, … C. Thery·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2020
- Nano-flow cytometry of single extracellular vesicles reveals subpopulation differences across cell types and pharmacological perturbations
Nathalie Névo, Alix Zhou, … Clotilde Théry·Journal of Extracellular VesiclesPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2026
- Differentiation of Large Extracellular Vesicles in Oral Fluid: Combined Protocol of Small Force Centrifugation and Pattern Analysis
Takamasa Kawano, Kohji Okamura, … Kiyotaka Shiba·Journal of Extracellular BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2024
- Volumetric microscopy of CD9 and CD63 reveals distinct subpopulations and novel structures of extracellular vesicle in situ in triple negative breast cancer cells
E. D. White, N. D. Walker, … M. R. Rosner·bioRxiv·Nov 8, 2022