Biological aging of different blood cell types
Saara MarttilaiD, Sonja RajićiD, Joanna CiantariD, Jonathan K. L. MakiD, Ilkka JunttilaiD, Laura KummolaiD, Sara HäggiD, Emma RaitoharjuiD, Laura KananeniD
Abstract
A biological age (BA) indicator is intended to capture detrimental age-related changes occurring with passing time. To date, the best-known and used BA indicators include DNA-methylation-based epigenetic ages (epigenetic clocks) and telomere length. The most common biological sample material for epidemiological aging studies is composed of different cell types, whole blood. We aimed to compare differences in BAs between blood cell types and assessed BA indicators cell type-specific associations with donors calendar age. Analysis on DNA methylation-based BA indicators including telomere length, methylation level at cg16867657 (a CpG-site in ELOVL2) and the Hannum, Horvath, DNAmPhenoAge and DunedinPACE epigenetic clocks was performed in 428 biological samples from 12 blood cell types. BA values were different (p<0.05) in the majority of pairwise comparisons between the cell types. Most cell types also displayed differences as compared to whole blood (p<0.05). Some of the observed differences persisted across blood donors calendar ages from 20 to 80 years (50-years-difference in DNAmPhenoAge between naive CD4+ T cells and monocytes), while others did not (up to four-fold difference in DunedinPACE values between monocytes and B cells). All BA indicators, except DunedinPACE, had mostly a very strong correlation with donors calendar age within a cell type. Our findings demonstrate that DNA methylation-based indicators of biological age exhibit cell type-specific characteristics, underscoring the importance of accounting for cell composition in related studies. Our results have implications for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying epigenetic clocks and and provide guidance for utilizing them as indicators for success of aging interventions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 17
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Field percentile
- top 10%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Probing epigenetic clocks as a rational markers of biological age using blood cell counts
Thomas H. Jonkman, Erik W. van Zwet, Bastiaan T. Heijmans·medRxiv·May 12, 2025
- Single cell DNA methylation ageing in mouse blood
M. J. Bonder, S. Clark, … F. von Meyenn·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2023
- Cell-type specific epigenetic clocks to quantify biological age at cell-type resolution
Huige Tong, Xiaolong Guo, … Andrew Erich Teschendorff·AgingPeer-reviewed·Dec 29, 2024
- Cross-Tissue Comparison of Epigenetic Aging Clocks in Humans
Abner T. Apsley, Qiaofeng Ye, … Idan Shalev·Aging CellPeer-reviewed·Jan 9, 2025
- Quantification of the pace of biological aging in humans through a blood test: The DunedinPoAm DNA methylation algorithm
Daniel W. Belsky, Avshalom Caspi, … Terrie E. Moffitt·eLifePeer-reviewed·May 5, 2020
- Differential DNA methylation clock ages across buffy coat (BC), peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and saliva in individuals in early-to-mid adulthood
Ryan Bruellman, Donald Evans, … Chandra A. Reynolds·EpigeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2026