NeuropharmacologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Distinct protein synthesis requirements for coupled excitatory and inhibitory long-term co-plasticity in mouse hippocampus
Jadwiga JabłońskaiD, Dominika OrzołiD, Dominika CiurkoiD, Grzegorz WieraiD, Jerzy Wladyslaw MozrzymasiD
Abstract
The functioning of neuronal networks critically depends on the coordinated interaction between excitation and inhibition. The properties of glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses are finely tuned by network activity, and the heterosynaptic nature of inhibitory plasticity further emphasizes their functional coupling. Although the dependence of glutamatergic plasticity on protein synthesis is well established, the role of translation in inhibitory plasticity remains unclear. Herein, we investigated how protein synthesis supports the concurrent plasticity at inhibitory and excitatory inputs onto CA1 pyramidal neurons. To this end, we applied a high-frequency stimulation protocol of CA3-CA1 input combined with prolonged postsynaptic depolarization of principal cells. This induced both glutamatergic long-term potentiation (LTP) and inhibitory LTP (iLTP) at synapses formed by somatostatin-expressing interneurons onto pyramidal neurons. Although LTP was observed in slices from both juvenile ([≤]45 days) and adult (>45 days) mice, iLTP was only present in the adult group, revealing an unusual developmental profile. Moreover, in adult animals, excitatory LTP was required for the induction of iLTP but did not determine its magnitude. We found that bath application of translation inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) strongly attenuated LTP and converted co-occurring iLTP into iLTD. However, when CHX was restricted to the recorded postsynaptic neuron, the initial phase of iLTP proceeded normally, but GABAergic currents gradually returned to baseline levels, indicating intact induction but impaired maintenance. In contrast, postsynaptic CHX left excitatory LTP unaffected. Together, these findings identify two distinct translational mechanisms: a postsynaptic one necessary for strengthening inhibition and a non-postsynaptic process required to potentiate excitation.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- top 26%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- miRNA-mediated control of gephyrin synthesis drives sustained inhibitory synaptic plasticity
Theresa M. Welle, Dipen Rajgor, … Katharine R. Smith·EMBO ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2024
- Chronic neuronal excitation leads to homeostatic suppression of structural long-term potentiation
Hiromi H. Ueda, Aiko Sato, … Hideji Murakoshi·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2021
- Cell-autonomous regulation of structural and functional plasticity in inhibitory neurons by excitatory synaptic inputs
Hai‐yan He, Wanhua Shen, … Hollis T. Cline·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 18, 2018
- Heterosynaptic Plasticity Determines the Set-Point for Cortical Excitatory-Inhibitory Balance
Rachel E. Field, James A. D’amour, … Robert C. Froemke·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Mar 25, 2020
- Disinhibitory and neuromodulatory regulation of hippocampal synaptic plasticity
Inês C. Guerreiro, Zhenglin Gu, … Boris S Gutkin·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2020
- Interneuron-specific plasticity at parvalbumin and somatostatin inhibitory synapses onto CA1 pyramidal neurons shapes hippocampal output
Matt Udakis, Victor Pedrosa, … Jack R. Mellor·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2020