Briefings in BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Genome-wide circadian rhythm detection methods: systematic evaluations and practical guidelines
Wenwen MeiiD, Zhiwen JiangiD, Yang CheniD, Li CheniD, Aziz SancariD, Yuchao JiangiD
Abstract
Circadian rhythms are oscillations of behavior, physiology, and metabolism in many organisms. Recent advancements in omics technology make it possible for genome-wide profiling of circadian rhythms. Here, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of seven existing algorithms commonly used for circadian rhythm detection. Using gold-standard circadian and non-circadian genes, we systematically evaluated the accuracy and reproducibility of the algorithms on empirical datasets generated from various omics platforms under different experimental designs. We also carried out extensive simulation studies to test each algorithms robustness to key variables, including sampling patterns, replicates, waveforms, signal-to-noise ratios, uneven samplings, and missing values. Furthermore, we examined the distributions of the nominal p-values under the null and raised issues with multiple testing corrections using traditional approaches. With our assessment, we provide method selection guidelines for circadian rhythm detection, which are applicable to different types of high-throughput omics data. Key pointsO_LIVarious methods have been developed for circadian rhythm detection on a genome-wide scale using omics technologies, yet there has not been a comprehensive summary and evaluation of all existing methods to date. C_LIO_LIUsing gold-standard circadian and non-circadian genes, we systematically evaluated the accuracy and reproducibility of seven existing algorithms for circadian rhythm detection on empirical datasets generated from various omics platforms. C_LIO_LIWe carried out extensive simulation studies to test each algorithms robustness to key variables, including sampling patterns, replicates, waveforms, signal-to-noise ratios, uneven samplings, and missing values. C_LIO_LIWe examined the distributions of the nominal p-values under the null and raised issues with multiple testing corrections using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure due to gene-gene correlation and testing being overly conservative. C_LIO_LIWe provide method selection guidelines for circadian rhythm detection, which are applicable to different types of high-throughput omics data. C_LI
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 52
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Correcting for Dependent P-values in Rhythm Detection
Alan L. Hutchison, Aaron R. Dinner·bioRxiv·Mar 20, 2017
- A Bayesian Framework for Genome-wide Circadian Rhythmicity Biomarker Detection
Haocheng Ding, Lingsong Meng, … Zhiguang Huo·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 31, 2025
- Experimental Design and Power Calculation in Omics Circadian Rhythmicity Detection
Wei Zong, Marianne L. Seney, … Zhiguang Huo·bioRxiv·Jan 19, 2022
- TimeTrial: An Interactive Application for Optimizing the Design and Analysis of Transcriptomic Times-Series Data in CircadianBiology Research
Elan Ness-Cohn, Marta Iwanaszko, … Rosemary Braun·Journal of Biological RhythmsPeer-reviewed·Jul 2, 2020
- Methods detecting rhythmic gene expression are biologically relevant only for strong signal.
David Laloum, Marc Robinson‐Rechavi·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 17, 2020
- Circadian Oscillation Detection Analysis and Comparison (CODAC): a Multicriteria Method to Estimate and Compare Rhythmicity
Thiago Parente da Silveira, Karla Lincoln, … Leonardo Vinícius Monteiro de Assis·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2026