The Converging Effects of Different Categories of Antidepressants on the Brain: A Systematic Meta-Analysis of Public Transcriptional Profiling Data from the Hippocampus and Cortex
Eva M GeogheganiD, Megan Hastings HagenaueriD, Erin HernandeziD, Sophia EspinozaiD, Elizabeth I. FlandreauiD, Phi T. NguyeniD, Adrienne N. SantiagoiD, Mubashshir Ra'eed BhuiyaniD, Sophie Mensch, Stanley J. WatsoniD, Huda AkiliD, René HeniD
Abstract
Depression can be treated with traditional pharmaceuticals targeting monoaminergic function, non-traditional drug classes and neuromodulatory interventions. To identify mechanisms of action shared across clinically-effective antidepressant treatment categories, we performed two systematic meta-analyses of public transcriptional profiling data from adult laboratory rodents (rats, mice). The outcome variable was gene expression, measured by microarray or RNA-Seq from bulk-dissected tissue from two depression-related brain regions (hippocampus, cortex). Relevant datasets were identified in the Gemma database of curated, reprocessed transcriptional profiling data using predefined search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria (hippocampus: 6-24-2024, cortex: 7-10-2024). Differential expression results were extracted for all genes, minimizing bias. For each gene, a random effects meta-analysis model was fit to antidepressant vs. control effect sizes (Log2 Fold Changes) from each study for each brain region, with follow-up analyses exploring sources of effect heterogeneity. For the hippocampus, 15 relevant studies were identified, containing 22 antidepressant vs. control group comparisons (collective n=313 samples), with approximately half representing traditional versus non-traditional antidepressants. Of 16,439 analyzed genes, 58 were consistently differentially expressed (False Discovery Rate (FDR) View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14538e3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@199c5e3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8ed8a6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@31b1f8_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Field percentile
- top 33%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Meta-Analysis of the Converging Effects of Different Classes of Antipsychotics on the Frontal Cortex Transcriptome in Laboratory Rodents and Non-Human Primates
Mubashshir Ra'eed Bhuiyan, Megan Hastings Hagenauer, … Huda Akil·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2026
- Pharmacodynamic profiles inform systematization, efficacy and whole-brain drug distribution profiles in 18 antidepressants
Benjamin Hänisch, Sofie Louise Valk·bioRxiv·Apr 29, 2026
- Antidepressant mechanism and treatment response define distinct hippocampal-amygdala circuit biomarkers during emotional memory in humans
Madelyn R. Castro, Hannah K. Ballard, … Stephanie L. Leal·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2026
- Gene expression signatures of response to fluoxetine treatment: systematic review and meta-analyses
David G. Cooper, J. Paige Cowden, … Caleb A. Class·Molecular PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2025
- TCF7L2: a potential key regulator of antidepressant effects on hippocampal astrocytes in depression model mice
Yusaku Koga, Naoto Kajitani, … Minoru Takebayashi·Journal of Psychiatric ResearchPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2024
- Molecular signaling associated with antidepressant actions exhibits diurnal fluctuations in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus of adult male and female mice
Gemma González-Hernández, Stanislav V. Rozov, … Tomi Rantamäki·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2026