The independent and combined influence of schizophrenia polygenic risk score and heavy cannabis use on risk for psychotic disorder: A case-control analysis from the EUGEI study.
Marta Di FortiiD, Beatrice Wu-Choi, Diego QuattroneiD, Alexander L. RichardsiD, Tom P. FreemaniD, Giada TripoliiD, Charlotte E. Gayer-AndersoniD, Victoria RodrígueziD, Hannah E. JongsmaiD, Laura FerraroiD, Caterina La CasciaiD, Sarah TosatoiD, Ilaria TarriconeiD, Domenico BerardiiD, Andreı̈ SzökeiD, Celso ArangoiD, Julio BobesiD, Julio SanjuániD, José Luis SantosiD, Manuel ArrojoiD, Eva VelthorstiD, Miquel BernardoiD, Cristina Marta Del‐BeniD, Jean‐Paul SelteniD, Peter Brian JonesiD, , EU-GEI WP2 Group
Abstract
Background: Some recent studies have challenged the direction of causality for the association between cannabis use and psychotic disorder, suggesting that cannabis use initiation is explained by common genetic variants associated with risk of schizophrenia. We used data from the European Union Gene-Environment Interaction consortium (EUGEI) case-control study to test for the independent and combined effect of heavy cannabis use, and of Schizophrenia Polygenic risk score (SZ PRS), on risk for psychotic disorder. Methods: Genome-wide data were obtained from 492 first episode psychosis patients (FEPp) and from 787 controls of European Ancestry, and used to generate SZ PRS from the summary results of an independent meta-analysis. Information on pattern of cannabis use was used to build a 7-level frequency-type composite cannabis use measure that we previously found was a strong predictor of psychotic disorder. Results: SZ PRS did not predict cannabis initiation (b=0.027; p=0.51) or how frequently controls (b=0.027; p=0.06) or FEPp (b=0.006; p=0.91) used it, or the type of cannabis they used (Controls: b = 0.032; p=0.31); FEPp: b= 0.005; p=0.89). The frequency-type composite cannabis use measure (OR=1.32; 95% CI 1.22-1.44) and SZ PRS (OR=2.29; 95%CI 1.71-3.05) showed independent effects from each other on the OR for psychotic disorder. Conclusion: SZ PRS does not predict an individual s propensity to try cannabis, frequency of use, or the potency of the cannabis used. Our findings provide the first evidence that SZ PRS and heavy cannabis use exert effects independent from each other on the risk for psychotic disorder.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 12
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Investigating the Polygenic Relationship Between Cannabis Use and Schizophrenia in the All of Us Research Program
Isabelle Austin-Zimmerman, Hayley HA Thorpe, … Sandra Sanchez‐Roige·medRxiv·May 20, 2025
- Association Between Substance Use Disorder And Polygenic Liability To Schizophrenia
Sarah M. Hartz, Amy C. Horton, … Laura Jean Bierut·Biological PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Jun 6, 2017
- Cannabis-associated symptom profiles in patients with first episode psychosis and population controls
Diego Quattrone, Laura Ferraro, … Marta Di Forti·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2019
- The effects of polygenic risk for psychiatric disorders and smoking behaviour on psychotic experiences in UK Biobank
Judit García‐González, Julia Ramírez, … Robert Keers·Translational PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Sep 28, 2020
- Genetic risk for schizophrenia influences substance use in emerging adulthood: An event-level polygenic prediction model
Travis T. Mallard, K. Paige Harden, Kim Fromme·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2018
- Higher genetic risk of schizophrenia is associated with lower cognitive performance in healthy individuals
Rebecca Shafee, Pranav Nanda, … Steven A. McCarroll·bioRxiv·Jan 27, 2017