bioRxivBiochemistry
Glycan size and attachment site location affect electron transfer dissociation (ETD) fragmentation and automated glycopeptide identification
K. Alagesan, H. Hinneburg, P. Seeberger, D. Varon Silva, D. Kolarich
Abstract
We used a small synthetic glycopeptide library to systematically evaluate the effect of glycosylation site location and glycan size on the efficiency of ETD MS/MS fragmentation and subsequent automated identification. Understanding how the physico-chemical properties of glycopeptides influence glycopeptide fragmentation allows for optimizing fragmentation conditions and software assisted data analyses, which rely on informative fragmentation spectra for subsequent data processing to identify glycopeptides. Often, mis-assignment of glycopeptides occurs due to uncertainties such as failure to produce sufficient peptide backbone fragment ions. Our synthetic glycopeptide library contained glycopeptides differing in glycosylation site position within the peptide as well as glycan size (from the pentasaccharide N-glycan core to fully sialylated, biantennary N-glycans). Different software solutions such as SEQUEST and Amanda were compared for ETD glycopeptide identification. We found that all, glycan size, glycosylation site position within a glycopeptide and individual precursor m/z significantly impacted the number and quality of assignable glycopeptide backbone fragments, and thus the likelihood to be correctly identified in software assisted data analyses.
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: protein folding & dynamics
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Electron-Activated Dissociation and Collision-Induced Dissociation Glycopeptide Fragmentation for Improved Glycoproteomics
K. L. Macauslane, C. L. Pegg, … B. L. Schulz·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2024
- Unifying N- and O-glycopeptide dissociation methods with expedient electron transfer dissociation
Haley M. Schramm, Tim S. Veth, … Nicholas McIlvain Riley·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2026
- Evaluating the performance of photon- and electron-based fragmentation methods in Omnitrap-LCMS analysis of N-glycopeptides
Nikita Levin, Daniel A. Polasky, … Shabaz Mohammed·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Jun 26, 2026
- Expanding N-Glycopeptide Identifications by Fragmentation Prediction and Glycome Network Smoothing
Joshua Klein, Luis Eduardo Carvalho, Joseph Zaia·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2021
- Precise, Fast and Comprehensive Analysis of Intact Glycopeptides and Modified Saccharide Units with pGlyco3
Wen-Feng Zeng, Wei-Qian Cao, … Pengyuan Yang·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2021
- Multi-attribute Glycan Identification and FDR Control for Glycoproteomics
Daniel A. Polasky, Daniel Geiszler, … Alexey I. Nesvizhskii·Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsPeer-reviewed·Jan 26, 2022