bioRxivSystems BiologyPreprint
Unifying N- and O-glycopeptide dissociation methods with expedient electron transfer dissociation
Haley M. SchrammiD, Tim S. VethiD, Joshua D. HinkleiD, JingJing Huang, David Bergen, Rafael Donadelli MelaniiD, Graeme C. McAlisteriD, Christopher Mullen, Nicholas McIlvain RileyiD
Abstract
The glycoproteome is highly heterogeneous, where each glycosite can be modified by potentially hundreds of glycan compositions. This complexity necessitates methods that can provide glycosite-specific characterization in a high-throughput manner. Electron transfer dissociation (ETD) is particularly valuable for glycopeptide analysis, where it is critical for glycosite localization in O-glycopeptides and often produces higher quality spectra than higher energy collisional dissociation (HCD) for N-glycopeptides. Despite this, lower quality HCD spectra are often favored in high-throughput glycoproteomics experiments because the near instantaneous fragmentation of HCD results in faster MS/MS spectral acquisition relative to ETD. In short, overhead times for ETD reactions limit acquisition rates and sensitivity that can outweigh its advantages. Here we implement changes to ion handling, scan parallelization, and ion-ion reaction conditions to increase ETD MS/MS acquisition rates on the Orbitrap Tribrid MS platform. We explore fundamental parameters of ETD ion-ion reactions, including reaction q-values (i.e., Mathieu q-values) and ion-ion reaction time, showing that we can reduce the overhead of ion-ion reaction scan functions and improve the overall synchronization of data acquisition. These optimizations lead to faster spectral acquisition times for ETD MS/MS spectra while maintaining high spectral quality. Ultimately, these improvements allow the ETD scan functions to be nested within ion accumulation times needed per MS/MS spectrum, enabling ETD spectral acquisition to be parallelized within the duty cycle of the instrument and removing the major time cost to doing ETD-based fragmentation. We argue that this expedient implementation of ETD makes ETD-based fragmentation a universally beneficial dissociation method for both N- and O-glycopeptides.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluating the performance of photon- and electron-based fragmentation methods in Omnitrap-LCMS analysis of N-glycopeptides
Nikita Levin, Daniel A. Polasky, … Shabaz Mohammed·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Jun 26, 2026
- Electron-Activated Dissociation and Collision-Induced Dissociation Glycopeptide Fragmentation for Improved Glycoproteomics
K. L. Macauslane, C. L. Pegg, … B. L. Schulz·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2024
- Glycan size and attachment site location affect electron transfer dissociation (ETD) fragmentation and automated glycopeptide identification
K. Alagesan, H. Hinneburg, … D. Kolarich·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2019
- Protein complex heterogeneity and topology revealed by electron capture charge reduction and surface induced dissociation
Jared Shaw, Sophie R. Harvey, … Vicki Hopper Wysocki·ACS Central SciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 26, 2024
- Defining glycoproteoform landscapes through an integrated glycoproteomics approach enabled by high-resolving power proton transfer charge reduction tandem mass spectrometry
Tim S. Veth, Emmajay Sutherland, … Nicholas McIlvain Riley·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2026
- Capturing site-specific heterogeneity with large-scale N-glycoproteome analysis
Nicholas McIlvain Riley, Alexander S. Hebert, … Joshua J. Coon·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 21, 2019