Sign in
BiochemistryEMBO Molecular Medicine
Peer-reviewed journal article

Pre-Analytical Drivers of Bias in Bead-Enriched Plasma Proteomics

Kathrin KorffiD, Johannes MülleriD, Dorothea Fichtl, Vincent AlbrechtiD, Alicia-Sophie SchebestaiD, Ericka C M ItangiD, Sebastian Virreira WinteriD, Lesca Miriam HoldtiD, Daniel TeupseriD, Matthias ManniD, Philipp Emanuel GeyeriD

Abstract

Bead-based enrichment has emerged as a promising strategy to improve depth in plasma proteomics by overcoming the dynamic range barrier. However, its robustness against pre-analytical variation has not been sufficiently characterized. Here, we systematically evaluate five plasma proteomics workflows--including three bead-based methods and two conventional protocols--using controlled spike-ins of low-abundance proteins and defined cellular contaminants. We find that bead-based approaches enhance detection of low-abundance proteins but can be highly susceptible to systematic bias from platelet and PBMC contamination, even at low levels. This can easily inflate results by thousands of proteins, likely accounting for some of the very high literature-reported numbers. In contrast, a perchloric acid-based workflow shows notable resistance to erythrocyte and platelet-derived contamination. We further investigate how centrifugation conditions, anticoagulant choice, and buffer-bead combinations modulate contamination profiles and demonstrate that bias can partially be mitigated by optimized sample handling. In total, we identify more than 13,000 different protein groups from various conditions, including cellular components from the circulating proteome. Our results provide a quantitative framework for assessing workflow performance under variable sample quality and offer guidance for both biomarker discovery and quality control in clinical proteomics studies.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
34
FWCI
8.56
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISEmery‐Corbi '26Kverneland '25Gao '25Ardle '21Niu '25Albrecht '25
74% semantic matchSystems Biology