Sign in

Abstract

Behavior relies on continuous influx of sensory information about the body. In primates, motor cortex must integrate somatic feedback to accurately reach and manipulate objects. Yet, prior work demonstrates that motor cortex is well-described with deterministic, rather than input-driven, dynamics. Deterministic dynamics facilitate robust movement generation, but flexible motor output requires rapid responses to unexpected inputs. Here, we resolved this paradox by simultaneously recording neural population activity in motor and somatosensory cortex from four monkeys performing a naturalistic object interaction behavior resulting in occasional errors. Motor cortex was strikingly input-driven surrounding behavioral error correction. Intriguingly, input-driven dynamics were isolated to a subspace of the population activity that putatively captured somatosensory feedback. Using electrical stimulation of ascending somatosensory tracts, we causally verified that this feedback subspace captured peripheral inputs to cortex. Our results demonstrate that cortical activity is compartmentalized within distinct subspaces, enabling flexible integration of salient inputs for robust behavior.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Abstract summary

Verified abstract synthesis

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-ND 4.0

Recordings from four monkeys handling objects place input-driven activity in one putative somatosensory-feedback subspace of motor cortex, prominent around error correction and probed by stimulating ascending tracts.

Motor cortex has been described well by deterministic dynamics, which help generate movement robustly but leave no obvious route for fast reactions to unexpected somatic feedback. Compartmentalising population activity, with input-driven dynamics confined to one subspace, is offered as a way to have both.

Key results

  1. ClaimedAround moments when the animals corrected an error, motor cortex activity appeared input-driven rather than deterministic.

    Based on simultaneous population recordings in motor and somatosensory cortex of four monkeys during a naturalistic object interaction task that produced occasional errors; no effect size, model comparison or statistics appear in the text. · Abstract

  2. ClaimedThe input-driven component was confined to one subspace of the population activity, interpreted as carrying somatosensory feedback, while the rest of the activity remained deterministic.

    Stated as the central observation; the abstract reports no subspace dimensionality, variance explained or separation metric. · Abstract

  3. SuggestedElectrical stimulation of ascending somatosensory tracts was used as a causal test that this subspace receives peripheral input.

    Described as causal verification, with no stimulation parameters, response magnitudes or control conditions given in the text. · Abstract

Methods, data and reproducibility

Simultaneous recording of neural population activity in motor and somatosensory cortex of monkeys during a naturalistic object interaction behaviour with occasional errors, analysed for deterministic versus input-driven dynamics and for the subspaces carrying them, together with electrical stimulation of ascending somatosensory tracts as a causal manipulation.

  • simultaneous motor and somatosensory cortex population recordings during naturalistic object interaction with occasional errors · monkey · n = four monkeys
  • responses to electrical stimulation of ascending somatosensory tracts · monkey
Methods & tools
electrical stimulation of ascending somatosensory tracts
Reproducibility gaps
No code repository, data location or sharing statement appears in the abstract.
Limitations (2)
  • No statistics, variance-explained values or model comparisons are reported in the available text, so how much of motor cortex activity is input-driven, and how cleanly the subspaces separate, cannot be judged. · noted in this summary
  • Four animals performing a single class of behaviour; whether the same feedback subspace appears in other tasks or species is not addressed here. · noted in this summary

Who should read:Read this if you model motor cortex as a dynamical system and need to know where sensory feedback enters the population geometry.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.