Motor cortical dynamics are shaped by multiple distinct subspaces during naturalistic behavior
Matthew G. PerichiD, Sara ContiiD, Marion BadiiD, Andrew R. BogaardiD, Beatrice BarraiD, Kanaka RajaniD, Jocelyne BlochiD, Grégoire CourtineiD, Silvestro MiceraiD, Marco CapogrossoiD, Tomislav MilekoviciD
Abstract
Behavior relies on continuous influx of sensory information about the body. In primates, motor cortex must integrate somatic feedback to accurately reach and manipulate objects. Yet, prior work demonstrates that motor cortex is well-described with deterministic, rather than input-driven, dynamics. Deterministic dynamics facilitate robust movement generation, but flexible motor output requires rapid responses to unexpected inputs. Here, we resolved this paradox by simultaneously recording neural population activity in motor and somatosensory cortex from four monkeys performing a naturalistic object interaction behavior resulting in occasional errors. Motor cortex was strikingly input-driven surrounding behavioral error correction. Intriguingly, input-driven dynamics were isolated to a subspace of the population activity that putatively captured somatosensory feedback. Using electrical stimulation of ascending somatosensory tracts, we causally verified that this feedback subspace captured peripheral inputs to cortex. Our results demonstrate that cortical activity is compartmentalized within distinct subspaces, enabling flexible integration of salient inputs for robust behavior.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 46
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Abstract summary
Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-ND 4.0
Recordings from four monkeys handling objects place input-driven activity in one putative somatosensory-feedback subspace of motor cortex, prominent around error correction and probed by stimulating ascending tracts.
Motor cortex has been described well by deterministic dynamics, which help generate movement robustly but leave no obvious route for fast reactions to unexpected somatic feedback. Compartmentalising population activity, with input-driven dynamics confined to one subspace, is offered as a way to have both.
Key results
ClaimedAround moments when the animals corrected an error, motor cortex activity appeared input-driven rather than deterministic.
Based on simultaneous population recordings in motor and somatosensory cortex of four monkeys during a naturalistic object interaction task that produced occasional errors; no effect size, model comparison or statistics appear in the text. · Abstract
ClaimedThe input-driven component was confined to one subspace of the population activity, interpreted as carrying somatosensory feedback, while the rest of the activity remained deterministic.
Stated as the central observation; the abstract reports no subspace dimensionality, variance explained or separation metric. · Abstract
SuggestedElectrical stimulation of ascending somatosensory tracts was used as a causal test that this subspace receives peripheral input.
Described as causal verification, with no stimulation parameters, response magnitudes or control conditions given in the text. · Abstract
Methods, data and reproducibility
Simultaneous recording of neural population activity in motor and somatosensory cortex of monkeys during a naturalistic object interaction behaviour with occasional errors, analysed for deterministic versus input-driven dynamics and for the subspaces carrying them, together with electrical stimulation of ascending somatosensory tracts as a causal manipulation.
- simultaneous motor and somatosensory cortex population recordings during naturalistic object interaction with occasional errors · monkey · n = four monkeys
- responses to electrical stimulation of ascending somatosensory tracts · monkey
- Methods & tools
- electrical stimulation of ascending somatosensory tracts
- Reproducibility gaps
- No code repository, data location or sharing statement appears in the abstract.
Limitations (2)
- No statistics, variance-explained values or model comparisons are reported in the available text, so how much of motor cortex activity is input-driven, and how cleanly the subspaces separate, cannot be judged. · noted in this summary
- Four animals performing a single class of behaviour; whether the same feedback subspace appears in other tasks or species is not addressed here. · noted in this summary
Who should read:Read this if you model motor cortex as a dynamical system and need to know where sensory feedback enters the population geometry.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Natural prey capture reveals flexible reconfiguration of canonical motor-cortical dynamics for online control
Jeffrey D. Walker, Paul L. Aparicio, … Jason N. MacLean·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2026
- Direct neural perturbations reveal a dynamical mechanism for robust computation
Daniel J. O’Shea, Lea Duncker, … K.V. Shenoy·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2022
- Motor cortex is an input-driven dynamical system controlling dexterous movement
Britton Sauerbrei, Jian‐Zhong Guo, … Adam W. Hantman·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2018
- Continuous sensorimotor transformation enhances robustness of neural dynamics to perturbation in macaque motor cortex
Cong Zheng, Qifan Wang, He Cui·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2025
- Motor Cortical Output Integrates Distorted Proprioceptive Feedback
Yi Li, X. Hermione Xu, … Z. Josh Huang·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2025
- Flexible integration of corollary discharge and sensory feedback signals in somatosensory cortex
Xinyue An, Raeed H. Chowdhury, … Joshua I. Glaser·bioRxiv·Apr 14, 2026