Sign in
Molecular BiologyCell Reports
Peer-reviewed journal article

Dietary macronutrients modulate the proteome of brown adipose tissue in males and their female offspring

Erin L. MacartneyiD, Alistair McNair SenioriD, Angela J. CreaniD, Lewin SmalliD, Lou Ruffino, Tamara Pulpitel, Marcelo A. NóbregaiD, Romain BarrèsiD, Stephen James SimpsoniD

Abstract

Brown adipose tissue (BAT) dissipates energy as heat, not only under cold exposure but also in the dissipation of excess ingested energy. Therefore, enhancing BAT activity is a potential avenue to combat weight gain. Dietary macronutrient composition influences BAT size and has recently been shown to influence BAT size of daughters through the patriline of C57BL/6J mice. However, the effects of macronutrient composition and any paternal effects on BAT function have yet to be characterised. Using the Geometric Framework for Nutrition, we investigated the effects of macronutrient composition on the BAT proteome in male mice and intergenerational effects in their offspring. In fathers, >50% of the proteome was affected by macronutrient composition, with distinct clusters of proteins that responded in similar ways. We identified two clusters with inverse patterns that correlated with BAT mass. Notably, UCP1 was reduced on low fat diets that promoted increased BAT mass, while there were increased levels of proteins involved in protein turnover on those same diets. The same diets also led to a reduction in proteins involved in purine biosynthesis (often UCP1 inhibitors). We did not find any effects of paternal diet on the BAT proteome in sons, but paternal protein intake negatively affected basigin expression in daughters - a protein that regulates UCP1 transcription. Our results highlight that dietary macronutrient composition in males remodels the protein expression landscape of BAT, and pre-conceptionally reprograms BAT expression profiles of female offspring.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
1
FWCI
0.64
Field percentile
top 32%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.