bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Non-coding variants impact cis-regulatory coordination in a cell type-specific manner
Olga PushkareviD, Guido van MierloiD, Judith F. Kribelbauer-SwietekiD, Wouter SaelensiD, Vincent GardeuxiD, Bart DeplanckeiD
Abstract
BACKGROUNDInteractions among cis-regulatory elements (CREs) play a crucial role in gene regulation. Various approaches have been developed to map these interactions genome-wide, including those relying on interindividual epigenomic variation to identify groups of covariable regulatory elements, referred to as chromatin modules (CMs). While CM mapping allows to investigate the relationship between chromatin modularity and gene expression, the computational principles used for CM identification vary in their application and outcomes. RESULTSWe comprehensively evaluate and streamline existing CM mapping tools and present guidelines for optimal utilization of epigenome data from a diverse population of individuals to assess regulatory coordination across the human genome. We showcase the effectiveness of our recommended practices by analysing distinct cell types and demonstrate cell type-specificity of CRE interactions in CMs and their relevance for gene expression. Integration of genotype information revealed that many non-coding disease-associated variants affect the activity of CMs in a cell type-specific manner by affecting the binding of cell type-specific transcription factors. We provide example cases that illustrate in detail how CMs can be used to deconstruct GWAS loci, understand variable expression of cell surface receptors in immune cells and reveal how genetic variation can impact the expression of prognostic markers in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. CONCLUSIONSOur study presents an optimal strategy for CM mapping, and reveals how CMs capture the coordination of CREs and its impact on gene expression. Non-coding genetic variants can disrupt this coordination, and we highlight how this may lead to disease predisposition in a cell type-specific manner.
- organism: human
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genetic variation in correlated regulatory region of Immunity
Diana Avalos, Guillaume Rey, … Olivier Delaneau·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2022
- GEM-Finder: dissecting GWAS variants via long-range interacting cis-regulatory elements with differentiation-specific genes
Gyeongsik Park, Andrew Lee, Inkyung Jung·Lecture notes in computer sciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Shared activity patterns arising at genetic susceptibility loci reveal underlying genomic and cellular architecture of human disease.
John Kenneth Baillie, Andrew D. Bretherick, … David Arthur Hume·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2018
- Intra- and inter-chromosomal chromatin interactions mediate genetic effects on regulatory networks
Olivier Delaneau, Marianna Zazhytska, … Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis·SciencePeer-reviewed·May 2, 2019
- Leveraging epigenomes and three-dimensional genome organization for interpreting regulatory variation
Brittany A. Baur, Jacob Matthew Schreiber, … Sushmita Roy·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 10, 2023
- Single-Nucleus Multi-Omic Atlas Maps Regulatory Architecture and Non-Coding Variant Effects across Adult Human Tissues
Kaili Fan, Amrita D. Sule, … Kristin Ardlie·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2026