bioRxivBiochemistry
Systematic identification of conditionally folded intrinsically disordered regions by AlphaFold2
T. R. Alderson, I. Pritisanac, Đesika Kolaric, A. M. Moses, J. D. Forman-Kay
Abstract
The AlphaFold Protein Structure Database contains predicted structures for millions of proteins. For the majority of human proteins that contain intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), which do not adopt a stable structure, it is generally assumed these regions have low AlphaFold2 confidence scores that reflect low-confidence structural predictions. Here, we show that AlphaFold2 assigns confident structures to nearly 15% of human IDRs. By comparison to experimental NMR data for a subset of IDRs that are known to conditionally fold (i.e., upon binding or under other specific conditions), we find that AlphaFold2 often predicts the structure of the conditionally folded state. Based on databases of IDRs that are known to conditionally fold, we estimate that AlphaFold2 can identify conditionally folding IDRs at a precision as high as 88% at a 10% false positive rate, which is remarkable considering that conditionally folded IDR structures were minimally represented in its training data. We find that human disease mutations are nearly 5-fold enriched in conditionally folded IDRs over IDRs in general, and that up to 80% of IDRs in prokaryotes are predicted to conditionally fold, compared to less than 20% of eukaryotic IDRs. These results indicate that a large majority of IDRs in the proteomes of human and other eukaryotes function in the absence of conditional folding, but the regions that do acquire folds are more sensitive to mutations. We emphasize that the AlphaFold2 predictions do not reveal functionally relevant structural plasticity within IDRs and cannot offer realistic ensemble representations of conditionally folded IDRs. Significance StatementAlphaFold2 and other machine learning-based methods can accurately predict the structures of most proteins. However, nearly two-thirds of human proteins contain segments that are highly flexible and do not autonomously fold, otherwise known as intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). In general, IDRs interconvert rapidly between a large number of different conformations, posing a significant problem for protein structure prediction methods that define one or a small number of stable conformations. Here, we found that AlphaFold2 can readily identify structures for a subset of IDRs that fold under certain conditions (conditional folding). We leverage AlphaFold2s predictions of conditionally folded IDRs to quantify the extent of conditional folding across the tree of life, and to rationalize disease-causing mutations in IDRs. Classifications: Biological Sciences; Biophysics and Computational Biology
- organism: human
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: protein structure prediction
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: deep learning
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Intrinsic Protein Disorder, Conditional Folding and AlphaFold2
Damiano Piovesan, Alexander Miguel Monzón, Silvio C. E. Tosatto·Protein SciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 10, 2022
- Disentangling the CHAOS of intrinsic disorder in human proteins
Ida de Vries, Jitske Bak, … Anastassis Perrakis A·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2024
- AlphaFlex: Ensembles of the human proteome representing disordered regions
Zi Hao Liu, Oufan Zhang, … Julie Deborah Forman-Kay·bioRxiv·Nov 24, 2025
- AlphaFold2 fails to predict protein fold switching
Devlina Chakravarty, Lauren L. Porter·Protein SciencePeer-reviewed·May 26, 2022
- IDPForge: Deep Learning of Proteins with Global and Local Regions of Disorder
Stefano De Castro, Oufan Zhang, … Teresa L. Head-Gordon·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2026
- AlphaFold2: A role for disordered protein prediction?
Carter J. Wilson, Wing‐Yiu Choy, Mikko Karttunen·International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewed·Apr 21, 2022