bioRxivPharmacology & ToxicologyPreprint
Concentration-dependent suppression of macrolide resistance in Mycobacterium avium by combination therapy: an improved in vitro time-kill assay and PK/PD modelling study
Fumiya WatanabeiD, Yuta MorishigeiD, Akio AonoiD, Yuji MoritaiD, Kozo MorimotoiD, Satoshi MitaraiiD, Kazuhiko Hanada
Abstract
ObjectivesMacrolides are key drugs in the treatment for Mycobacterium avium pulmonary disease, and combination chemotherapy is essential to preventing macrolide resistance. However, the concentrations of concomitant agents required to suppress resistance emergence remain undefined. This study aimed to quantify the concentration-dependent effects of companion drugs on macrolide resistance using an improved time-kill assay and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling approach. MethodsTime-kill assays were performed on M. avium ATCC 700898 using azithromycin alone or in combination with ethambutol, rifampicin, amikacin, or clofazimine. Total and resistant bacterial populations were quantified over 28 days. A pharmacodynamic (PD) model describing the dynamics of susceptible and resistant subpopulations was linked to a pharmacokinetic (PK) model incorporating alveolar macrophage concentrations to simulate resistance and bactericidal rates under various dosing regimens. ResultsMacrolide resistance most frequently emerged at 2-4x the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of azithromycin, whereas resistance was less frequent at 8-16x MIC or sub-MIC levels. The addition of companion drugs suppressed resistance emergence even at sub-MIC levels. PK/PD simulations demonstrated that standard-dose ethambutol effectively prevented macrolide resistance, whereas rifampicin provided minimal protection. More frequent dosing schedules enhanced resistance suppression compared with once-daily regimens. ConclusionThis study defines the concentration-dependent contributions of concomitant agents to macrolide resistance suppression in M. avium and establishes a quantitative PK/PD framework for evaluating resistance emergence. These findings provide mechanistic insights to support the optimization of combination dosing strategies for M. avium pulmonary disease.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Efficacies of sequenced monotherapies of Mycobacterium avium lung infection in mouse
Ruth A. Howe, Binayak Rimal, … Gyanu Lamichhane·The Journal of Infectious DiseasesPeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2025
- Tigecycline pharmacodynamics in the hollow fiber system of Mycobacterium avium-complex lung disease, and the utility of MICs and time-kill studies in drug development
Devyani Deshpande, Shashikant Srivastava, Tawanda Gumbo·Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 12, 2025
- Regimen comprising clarithromycin, clofazimine and bedaquiline is more efficacious than monotherapy in a mouse model of chronic Mycobacterium avium lung infection
Binayak Rimal, Ruth A. Howe, … Gyanu Lamichhane·Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyPeer-reviewed·Mar 14, 2025
- Novel regimens for treatment of Mycobacterium avium lung disease based on advanced in vitro systems and the mathematics of basis functions
Shashikant Srivastava, Sanjay Kumar Singh, … Tawanda Gumbo·bioRxiv·Mar 31, 2026
- Genetic determinants of intrinsic antibiotic tolerance in Mycobacterium avium
W. M. Matern, H. Parker, … P. C. Karakousis·bioRxiv·Feb 23, 2021
- Macrolide resistance through uL4 and uL22 ribosomal mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
L. Goltermann, P. Laborda, … R. La Rosa·bioRxiv·Apr 11, 2024