bioRxivCancer Biology
Redefining FLASH RT: the impact of mean dose rate and dose per pulse in the gastrointestinal tract
Kevin LiuiD, Trey Waldrop, Edgardo Aguilar, Nefetiti Mims, Denae Neill, Abagail Delahoussaye, Ziyi Li, David Swanson, Steven H. Lin, Albert C. KoongiD, Cullen M. TaniguchiiD, Billy W. LooiD, Devarati MitraiD, Emil SchüleriD
Abstract
BackgroundThe understanding of how varying radiation beam parameter settings affect the induction and magnitude of the FLASH effect remains limited. PurposeWe sought to evaluate how the magnitude of radiation-induced gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (RIGIT) depends on the interplay between mean dose rate (MDR) and dose per pulse (DPP). MethodsC57BL/6J mice were subjected to total abdominal irradiation (11-14 Gy single fraction) under conventional irradiation (low DPP and low MDR, CONV) and various combinations of DPP and MDR up to ultra-high-dose-rate (UHDR) beam conditions. The effects of DPP were evaluated for DPPs of 1-6 Gy while the total dose and MDR were kept constant; the effects of MDR were evaluated for the range 0.3- 1440 Gy/s while the total dose and DPP were kept constant. RIGIT was quantified in non-tumor-bearing mice through the regenerating crypt assay and survival assessment. Tumor response was evaluated through tumor growth delay. ResultsWithin each tested total dose using a constant MDR (>100 Gy/s), increasing DPP led to better sparing of regenerating crypts, with a more prominent effect seen at 12 and 14 Gy TAI. However, at fixed DPPs >4 Gy, similar sparing of crypts was demonstrated irrespective of MDR (from 0.3 to 1440 Gy/s). At a fixed high DPP of 4.7 Gy, survival was equivalently improved relative to CONV for all MDRs from 0.3 Gy/s to 104 Gy/s, but at a lower DPP of 0.93 Gy, increasing MDR produced a greater survival effect. We also confirmed that high DPP, regardless of MDR, produced the same magnitude of tumor growth delay relative to CONV using a clinically relevant melanoma mouse model. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the strong influence that the beam parameter settings have on the magnitude of the FLASH effect. Both high DPP and UHDR appeared independently sufficient to produce FLASH sparing of GI toxicity, while isoeffective tumor response was maintained across all conditions.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Decrease in dose per fraction impairs the FLASH sparing effect in murine intestine model
Anouk Sesink, R. Geyer, … Veljko Grilj·Radiotherapy and OncologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 3, 2025
- Discordance in acute gastrointestinal toxicity between synchrotron-based proton and linac-based electron ultra-high dose rate irradiation
Kevin Liu, Uwe Titt, … Emil Schüler·International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*PhysicsPeer-reviewed·Sep 8, 2024
- FLASH or flare: variable intestinal toxicity results in a mouse model following proton pencil beam scanning irradiation on a clinical superconducting synchrocyclotron
Eva Bogaerts, Ellina Macaeva, … Edmond Sterpin·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2025
- FLASH proton reirradiation, with or without hypofractionation, mitigates chronic toxicity in the normal murine intestine, skin, and bone.
Ioannis I. Verginadis, Anastasia P. Velalopoulou, … Theresa M. Busch·Radiotherapy and OncologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 27, 2025
- Effectiveness of FLASH vs conventional dose rate radiotherapy in a model of orthotopic, murine breast cancer
Stavros Melemenidis, Vignesh Viswanathan, … Frederick M. Dirbas·CancersPeer-reviewed·Mar 25, 2025
- Investigating Rat-Brain Normal Tissue and Tumor FLASH Effects with a Novel Very High Energy Electron Beam
Tyler V. Kay, Anna L. Price, … Mark Oldham·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2025