Decrease in dose per fraction impairs the FLASH sparing effect in murine intestine model
Anouk SesinkiD, R. GeyeriD, P DevanandiD, Till Tobias BöhleniD, Luca Soutter, Raphaël MoeckliiD, Claude J. BailatiD, Fernanda Gabriela HerreraiD, Veljko GriljiD
Abstract
PurposeFLASH radiotherapy (FLASH) can ease radiation-induced normal tissue toxicities; however, its benefit in clinically relevant fractionation protocols remains insufficiently explored. This study investigated the FLASH sparing effect under two fractionated regimens using a murine model of acute gastrointestinal toxicity. Methods and MaterialsTumor-free C57BL/6 mice received abdominal irradiation with either conventional radiotherapy (CONV) or FLASH using a 9 MeV electron beam. Three dose delivery protocols were assessed: single-fraction delivery, two equal fractions over two consecutive days, and ten equal daily fractions over two weeks. Dose escalation was performed within each protocol, while overall survival was used to monitor normal tissue sparing. The FLASH dose modifying factor (FDMF) was derived from normal tissue toxicity probability (NTCP) curves to quantify the relative protective effect of FLASH. ResultsThe single-fraction irradiation demonstrated a significant FLASH sparing effect, with an FDMF of 1.14. In contrast, this protective effect was diminished in the fractionated protocols, with the two-fraction regimen yielding an FDMF of 1.03, while the ten-fraction regimen showed no measurable sparing (FDMF = 1.00). ConclusionsIn an acute responding model of radiation-induced abdominal toxicity, the FLASH sparing effect was substantially reduced with a two-fraction regimen and completely absent with a ten-fraction regimen. These findings suggest that the benefit of FLASH may be limited at lower doses per fraction and highlight the need for further studies in other clinically relevant models to better define the boundaries of its therapeutic applicability. HighlightsO_LIFLASH-RT spares mice intestine from acute toxicity for single-dose delivery. C_LIO_LIFLASH effect declines in mice intestine with more fractions and less dose/fraction. C_LIO_LIFLASH sparing in mice intestine is lost with ten equal fractions over two weeks. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- FLASH proton reirradiation, with or without hypofractionation, mitigates chronic toxicity in the normal murine intestine, skin, and bone.
Ioannis I. Verginadis, Anastasia P. Velalopoulou, … Theresa M. Busch·Radiotherapy and OncologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 27, 2025
- Redefining FLASH RT: the impact of mean dose rate and dose per pulse in the gastrointestinal tract
Kevin Liu, Trey Waldrop, … Emil Schüler·International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*PhysicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2024
- FLASH or flare: variable intestinal toxicity results in a mouse model following proton pencil beam scanning irradiation on a clinical superconducting synchrocyclotron
Eva Bogaerts, Ellina Macaeva, … Edmond Sterpin·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2025
- FLASH radiotherapy using high-energy X-rays: validation of the FLASH effect triggered by a compact single high-energy X-ray source device
Binwei Lin, Huan Du, … Xiaobo Du·International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*PhysicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 13, 2025
- FLASH reduces radiation-induced oral mucositis in a mouse model of Fanconi anemia
Phoebe E. Loo, Margaret Pan, … Erinn B. Rankin·bioRxiv·May 28, 2026
- Effectiveness of FLASH vs conventional dose rate radiotherapy in a model of orthotopic, murine breast cancer
Stavros Melemenidis, Vignesh Viswanathan, … Frederick M. Dirbas·CancersPeer-reviewed·Mar 25, 2025