Uncertainty-driven regulation of learning and exploration in adolescents: A computational account
Marieke JepmaiD, Jessica Vera SchaafiD, Ingmar VisseriD, Hilde M. HuizengaiD
Abstract
Healthy adults flexibly adapt their learning strategies to ongoing changes in uncertainty, a key feature of adaptive behaviour. However, the developmental trajectory of this ability is yet unknown, as developmental studies have not incorporated trial-to-trial variation in uncertainty in their analyses or models. To address this issue, we compared adolescents and adults trial-to-trial dynamics of uncertainty, learning rate, and exploration in two tasks that assess learning in noisy but otherwise stable environments. In an estimation task--which provides direct indices of trial-specific learning rate--both age groups reduced their learning rate over time, as self-reported uncertainty decreased. Accordingly, the estimation data in both groups was better explained by a Bayesian model with dynamic learning rate (Kalman filter) than by conventional reinforcement-learning models. Furthermore, adolescents learning rates asymptoted at a higher level, reflecting an over-weighting of the most recent outcome, and the estimated Kalman-filter parameters suggested that this was due to an overestimation of environmental volatility. In a choice task, both age groups became more likely to choose the higher-valued option over time, but this increase in choice accuracy was smaller in the adolescents. In contrast to the estimation task, we found no evidence for a Bayesian expectation-updating process in the choice task, suggesting that estimation and choice tasks engage different learning processes. However, our modeling results of the choice task suggested that both age groups reduced their degree of exploration over time, and that the adolescents explored overall more than the adults. Finally, age-related differences in exploration parameters from fits to the choice data were mediated by participants volatility parameter from fits to the estimation data. Together, these results suggest that adolescents overestimate the rate of environmental change, resulting in elevated learning rates and increased exploration, which may help understand developmental changes in learning and decision-making. Author SummaryTo successfully learn the value of stimuli and actions, people should take into account their current (un)certainty about these values: Learning rates and exploration should be high when ones value estimates are highly uncertain (in the beginning of learning), and decrease over time as evidence accumulates and uncertainty decreases. Recent studies have shown that healthy adults flexibly adapt their learning strategies based on ongoing changes in uncertainty, consistent with normative learning. However, the development of this ability prior to adulthood is yet unknown, as developmental learning studies have not considered trial-to-trial changes in uncertainty. Here, we show that adolescents, as compared to adults, showed a smaller decrease in both learning rate and exploration over time. Computational modeling revealed that both of these effects were due to adolescents overestimating the amount of environmental volatility, which made them more sensitive to recent relative to older evidence. The overestimation of volatility during adolescence may represent the rapidly changing environmental demands during this developmental period, and can help understand the surge in real-life risk taking and exploratory behaviours characteristic of adolescents.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 53
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Modeling Changes in Probabilistic Reinforcement Learning during Adolescence
Liyu Xia, Sarah L. Master, … Anne Gabrielle Eva Collins·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2021
- Reinforcement Learning and Bayesian Inference Provide Complementary Models for the Unique Advantage of Adolescents in Stochastic Reversal
Maria Katharina Eckstein, Sarah L. Master, … Anne Gabrielle Eva Collins·Developmental Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2022
- Adaptive tuning of human learning and choice variability to unexpected uncertainty
J. K. Lee, M. Rouault, V. Wyart·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2022
- Do adolescents take more risks? Not when facing a novel uncertain situation
Noémi Éltető, Karolina Janacsek, … Dezső Németh·Cognitive DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2019
- Flexible belief updating drives the childhood advantage in statistical learning
Orsolya Pesthy, Eszter Tóth-Fáber, … Dezső Németh·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2026
- Humans adapt rationally to approximate estimates of uncertainty
Erdem Pulcu, Michael D Browning·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jul 8, 2025